Summary Calendar IN THE MATTER OF: VERNON LEE LAUX v. Vernon Lee Laux; Pamela Sue Laux

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
_____________________
No. 08-40444
Summary Calendar
_____________________
IN THE MATTER OF: VERNON LEE LAUX;
PAMELA SUE LAUX
Debtors
-----------------------------------------
BUCKEYE RETIREMENT CO LLC LTD
Appellant
v.
VERNON LEE LAUX; PAMELA SUE LAUX
Appellees
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Texas
(4:07-CV-181)
Before WIENER, STEWART, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Appellant Buckeye Retirement Co. LLC, Ltd. (“Buckeye”), as successor
in interest to the Cadle Company, appeals the judgment of the bankruptcy
court, as affirmed by the district court, rejecting Buckeye’s claim that a debt
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
December 15, 2008
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk

-- 1 of 2 --

2
owed to it by Appellees Vernon Lee Laux and Pamela Sue Laux (“Debtors”)
should not be discharged in their bankruptcy. The gravamen of Buckeye’s
contention is that the Debtors’ original Schedules and Statements of
Financial Affairs were knowingly false by virtue of omissions and
misrepresentations and that these errors should not be deemed cured by
revised filings.
We are satisfied by our review of the record on appeal, including the
facts and the law as set forth in the briefs of the parties, the Magistrate
Judge’s Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, and the district court’s
Memorandum Opinion & Order affirming the bankruptcy court’s rejection of
Buckeye’s opposition to the discharge of the subject debts, that the rulings of
those courts are correct. For essentially the reasons set forth by the district
court in its careful and exhaustive opinion, the judgment of the bankruptcy
court is, in all respects,
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --