United States of America v. Marcus Chiles

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 16-1478
___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee
v.
Marcus Chiles
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the District of Nebraska - Omaha
____________
Submitted: December 30, 2016
Filed: January 5, 2017
[Unpublished]
____________
Before SHEPHERD, ARNOLD, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.

-- 1 of 2 --

Marcus Chiles appeals the sentence the district court imposed after he pleaded1
guilty to a drug charge. His counsel has moved to withdraw and filed a brief under
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), challenging the length of the sentence.
Chiles pleaded guilty after entering into a written plea agreement containing
an appeal waiver. We conclude that the appeal waiver is enforceable. See United
States v. Scott, 627 F.3d 702, 704 (8th Cir. 2010) (de novo review of validity and
applicability of appeal waiver); United States v. Andis, 333 F.3d 886, 890-92 (8th
Cir. 2003) (en banc) (discussing enforcement of appeal waivers). Furthermore, we
have independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988),
and have found no non-frivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, we grant counsel’s
motion, and we dismiss this appeal.
______________________________
The Honorable Joseph F. Bataillon, United States District Judge for the1
District of Nebraska.
-2-

-- 2 of 2 --