Cynthia Jackson v. Target Corporation; Does, John Does 1 - 10 and XYZ Corporation

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 18-2410
___________________________
Cynthia Jackson
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant
v.
Target Corporation; Does, John Does 1 - 10 and XYZ Corporation
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Little Rock
____________
Submitted: February 26, 2019
Filed: March 1, 2019
[Unpublished]
____________
Before GRUENDER, BOWMAN, and STRAS, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
In this diversity action, Arkansas resident Cynthia Jackson appeals the district
court’s adverse grant of summary judgment on her negligence claim. After careful1
The Honorable James M. Moody Jr., United States District Judge for the1
Eastern District of Arkansas.

-- 1 of 2 --

de novo review, we conclude that summary judgment was proper for the reasons
stated by the district court. See W. Heritage Ins. Co. v. Asphalt Wizards, 795 F.3d
832, 836-37 (8th Cir. 2015) (reviewing grant of summary judgment de novo); see also
Harvey v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 33 F.3d 969, 971 (8th Cir. 1994) (discussing the
showing required in slip-and-fall cases under Arkansas law). Accordingly, we affirm.
See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-

-- 2 of 2 --