Terrance Schrammen v. ConAgra Foods, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 18-2464
___________________________
Terrance Schrammen
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant
v.
ConAgra Foods, Inc.
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the District of Minnesota
____________
Submitted: April 2, 2019
Filed: April 5, 2019
[Unpublished]
____________
Before ERICKSON, WOLLMAN, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Terrance Schrammen appeals the district court’s adverse grant of summary1
judgment in his pro se action asserting retaliation claims against his former employer,
The Honorable Wilhelmina M. Wright, United States District Judge for the1
District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable
David T. Schultz, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.

-- 1 of 2 --

ConAgra Foods, Inc. After careful de novo review, we conclude that summary
judgment was proper for the reasons stated by the district court. See Kunferman v.
Ford Motor Co., 112 F.3d 962, 965 (8th Cir. 1997) (grant of summary judgment is
reviewed de novo; record is reviewed in light most favorable to nonmoving party).
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-

-- 2 of 2 --