United States of America v. Allan Arceo

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 18-3601
___________________________
United States of America
Plaintiff - Appellee
v.
Allan Arceo
Defendant - Appellant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Northern District of Iowa – Waterloo
____________
Submitted: October 14, 2019
Filed: November 25, 2019
[Unpublished]
____________
Before SMITH, Chief Judge, GRUENDER and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Allan Arceo pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm in
violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(a)(2). His presentence investigation
report included a four-level enhancement for possession of a firearm in connection
with another felony offense. See U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(b)(6)(B). Arceo objected to the

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
enhancement. The district court1 overruled the objection and calculated a total
offense level of 17, a criminal history category of IV, and an advisory sentencing
guidelines range of 37 to 46 months. The district court sentenced Arceo to 37
months’ imprisonment.
Arceo argues on appeal that the district court erred in applying the four-level
enhancement for possession of a firearm in connection with another felony offense
because his possession of a firearm “merely facilitated another firearm possession
offense.” See Iowa Code § 724.4(1). He claims the enhancement is meant to address
“additional conduct that is somehow aided or advanced by a defendant’s firearm
possession.” We review a district court’s application of the sentencing guidelines
de novo. United States v. Johnson, 846 F.3d 1249, 1250 (8th Cir. 2017).
Arceo concedes that his argument is controlled by our decision in United
States v. Walker, 771 F.3d 449 (8th Cir. 2014). In Walker, we held that a violation
of Iowa Code section 724.4(1), as here, constitutes “another felony offense” for
purposes of a § 2K2.1(b)(6)(B) enhancement. 771 F.3d at 452-53. We thus affirm
the district court’s sentence. See United States v. Manning, 786 F.3d 684, 686 (8th
Cir. 2015) (“A panel of this Court is bound by a prior Eighth Circuit decision unless
that case is overruled by the Court sitting en banc.”).
______________________________
1 The Honorable Linda R. Reade, United States District Judge for the Northern
District of Iowa.

-- 2 of 2 --