United States v. Malliek Haynes

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 20-3402
___________________________
Jack R. T. Jordan
lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner
v.
U.S. Department of Labor
lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent
Dyncorp International, L.L.C.
lllllllllllllllllllllInterested party - Intervenor
___________________________
No. 20-3404
___________________________
Jack R. T. Jordan
lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner
v.
U.S. Department of Labor
lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent
Dyncorp International, L.L.C.
lllllllllllllllllllllInterested party - Intervenor
____________

-- 1 of 2 --

Petition for Review of an Order of the
Department of Labor (except OSHA)
____________
Submitted: November 2, 2021
Filed: November 5, 2021
[Unpublished]
____________
Before LOKEN, GRUENDER, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
In these consolidated cases, Jack Jordan petitions for review of final orders
from the United States Department of Labor Administrative Review Board (ARB).
After careful review, we conclude the ARB’s decisions were not arbitrary, capricious,
an abuse of discretion, contrary to the law, or unsupported by substantial evidence in
the record. See 49 U.S.C. § 31105(d) (appellate court reviews ARB’s decision
pursuant to Administrative Procedure Act); 5 U.S.C. § 706(2) (reviewing court shall
hold unlawful and set aside agency decision found to be arbitrary, capricious, abuse
of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law, or if unsupported by
substantial evidence in record). Accordingly, we deny Jordan’s petition in each case.
See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-

-- 2 of 2 --