Pierre Watson v. Officer Zachary Driskill, Individual capacity; Jessica Hanner, Sgt., Individually

22-2057Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit28 feb 2023

Testo completo

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 22-1673
___________________________
Pierre Watson
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant
v.
Officer Zachary Driskill, Individual capacity; Jessica Hanner, Sgt., Individually
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees
Diane Manley, Corporal, Individually; Kevin Brown, Correctional Officer,
Individually; John Hendrichs, Correctional Officer, Individually; Matthew
Unknown, Correctional Officer, Individually; Tammy Unknown, Sick Call Nurse,
Individually; Institution Doctor Unknown, Individually; Michelle Unknown;
Unknown Fulh
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants
___________________________
No. 22-2378
___________________________
Pierre Watson
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant
v.
Officer Zachary Driskill, Individual capacity; Jessica Hanner, Sgt., Individually
llllllllllllllllll llDefendants - Appellees

-- 1 of 3 --

Diane Manley, Corporal, Individually; Kevin Brown, Correctional Officer,
Individually; John Hendrichs, Correctional Officer, Individually; Matthew
Unknown, Correctional Officer, Individually; Tammy Unknown, Sick Call Nurse,
Individually; Institution Doctor Unknown, Individually; Michelle Unknown;
Unknown Fulh
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants
____________
Appeals from United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis
____________
Submitted: January 19, 2023
Filed: February 3, 2023
[Unpublished]
____________
Before GRUENDER, MELLOY, and STRAS, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Pierre Watson appeals the district court’s1 refusal to reconsider its grant of
summary judgment to the corrections officers who allegedly failed to protect him
from another inmate. Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties’
arguments on appeal, we conclude that there was no abuse of discretion in denying
his motions to set aside the judgment and compel discovery. See Freeman v. Wyeth,
764 F.3d 806, 809 (8th Cir. 2014); Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(a)(1) (requiring a party seeking
an order compelling discovery to first make “an effort to obtain it without court
action”). Also absent is any evidence of judicial bias. See Liteky v. United States,
1 The Honorable Audrey G. Fleissig, United States District Judge for the
Eastern District of Missouri.

-- 2 of 3 --

-3-
510 U.S. 540, 555 (1994). We accordingly affirm the judgment of the district court.
See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________

-- 3 of 3 --

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.