United States of America v. Adam Randal Shouse

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 22-3361
___________________________
United States of America
Plaintiff Appellee
v.
Adam Randal Shouse
Defendant Appellant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Southern District of Iowa - Eastern
____________
Submitted: March 27, 2023
Filed: March 31, 2023
[Unpublished]
____________
Before GRUENDER, STRAS, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Adam Shouse appeals after the district court1 revoked his supervised release
and sentenced him to 12 months in prison, followed by 15 months of supervised
1The Honorable Stephanie M. Rose, Chief Judge, United States District Court
for the Southern District of Iowa.

-- 1 of 2 --

release. His counsel has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief arguing that the
sentence is substantively unreasonable.
After careful review of the record, we conclude that the district court did not
abuse its discretion in imposing the revocation sentence. See United States v. Miller,
557 F.3d 910, 917-18 (8th Cir. 2009). There is no indication that the district court
overlooked a relevant 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factor, gave significant weight to an
improper or irrelevant factor, or committed a clear error of judgment in weighing the
relevant factors. See United States v. Larison, 432 F.3d 921, 923-24 (8th Cir. 2006);
see also United States v. Perkins, 526 F.3d 1107, 1110 (8th Cir. 2008) (holding that
a revocation sentence within the Guidelines range is accorded a presumption of
reasonableness on appeal).
Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and affirm.
______________________________
-2-

-- 2 of 2 --