United States of America v. Justin Seastrom

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 23-3500
___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee
v.
Justin Seastrom
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Northern District of Iowa - Cedar Rapids
____________
Submitted: May 30, 2024
Filed: June 6, 2024
[Unpublished]
____________
Before LOKEN, SHEPHERD, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Justin Seastrom appeals after the district court1 revoked his supervised release
and sentenced him to 18 months in prison and 18 months of supervised release.
1The Honorable Linda R. Reade, United States District Judge for the Northern
District of Iowa.

-- 1 of 2 --

During the revocation hearing, the district court informed Seastrom that he must
comply with the five special conditions of supervised release set forth in the
revocation worksheet prepared by the probation office and that the conditions were
incorporated by reference into the final judgment. Seastrom did not object or ask the
court to specify which conditions applied.
In this court, Seastrom’s counsel has moved for leave to withdraw, and has
filed a brief arguing that the special conditions included in the written judgment
should be stricken because the district court did not specifically recite each condition
during its oral pronouncement of the sentence. After careful review, we discern no
plain error in including the special conditions in the judgment. See United States v.
Drapeau, 644 F.3d 646, 657 (8th Cir. 2011) (standard of review); see also, e.g.,
United States v. Diggles, 957 F.3d 551, 563 (5th Cir. 2020) (sentencing court
pronounces supervision conditions when it orally adopts document recommending
those conditions). Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and affirm.
______________________________
-2-

-- 2 of 2 --