United States of America v. Tyrone Davis, also known as Tyrone D. Davis

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 24-1436
___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee
v.
Tyrone Davis, also known as Tyrone D. Davis
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis
____________
Submitted: June 26, 2024
Filed: July 1, 2024
[Unpublished]
____________
Before LOKEN, GRUENDER, and STRAS, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Tyrone Davis appeals after the district court1 denied his motion for a sentence
reduction under Guidelines Amendment 821. See 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2).
1The Honorable Stephen R. Clark, Chief Judge, United States District Court for
the Eastern District of Missouri.

-- 1 of 2 --

Upon careful review, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its
discretion in denying relief. See United States v. Tollefson, 853 F.3d 481, 485 (8th
Cir. 2017) (standard of review). The court’s Order Regarding Motion for Sentence
Reduction demonstrates that it was aware of and considered the relevant factors,
including the sentencing factors in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). See United States v. Rodd,
966 F.3d 740, 748 (8th Cir. 2020).
Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and affirm.
______________________________
-2-

-- 2 of 2 --