United States of America v. Willie Jay Lee

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 24-1027
___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee
v.
Willie Jay Lee
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Southern District of Iowa
____________
Submitted: July 24, 2024
Filed: August 9, 2024
[Unpublished]
____________
Before KELLY, GRASZ, and STRAS, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Willie Lee appeals the sentence the district court1 imposed after he pled guilty
to a drug offense. His counsel has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief
1The Honorable Rebecca Goodgame Ebinger, United States District Judge for
the Southern District of Iowa.

-- 1 of 2 --

under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), asserting claims of ineffective
assistance of counsel. Lee has also filed a motion for appointment of new counsel on
appeal.
We decline to consider Lee’s ineffective-assistance claim in this direct appeal.
Ineffective-assistance claims are normally deferred for proceedings under 28 U.S.C.
§ 2255, barring exceptional circumstances. See United States v. Looking Cloud, 419
F.3d 781, 788-89 (8th Cir. 2005). We conclude there are no such circumstances in
this case, as the record is not sufficiently developed to decide the merits of Lee’s
claim. See United States v. Ramirez-Hernandez, 449 F.3d 824, 826-27 (8th Cir.
2006) (stating ineffective-assistance claims are “usually best litigated in collateral
proceedings” where a record can be properly developed).
We have independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.
75 (1988), and have found no non-frivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, we grant
counsel leave to withdraw, deny Lee’s motion for appointment of new counsel, and
affirm.
______________________________
-2-

-- 2 of 2 --