United States of America v. Dominique Glosson, also known as Dominique Glossonsmith

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 24-1539
___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee
v.
Dominique Glosson, also known as Dominique Glossonsmith
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Western District of Missouri - Springfield
____________
Submitted: September 16, 2024
Filed: September 19, 2024
[Unpublished]
____________
Before LOKEN, GRUENDER, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Dominique Glosson appeals after he pleaded guilty to drug and firearm
offenses pursuant to a plea agreement that includes an appeal waiver. His counsel has

-- 1 of 2 --

moved to withdraw, and has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
(1967), challenging the sentence imposed by the district court.1
Upon careful review, we conclude that the appeal waiver is valid, enforceable,
and applicable to the issue raised in this appeal. See United States v. Scott, 627 F.3d
702, 704 (8th Cir. 2010); United States v. Andis, 333 F.3d 886, 889-92 (8th Cir.
2003) (en banc). We have also independently reviewed the record under Penson v.
Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988), and have found no non-frivolous issues for appeal outside
the scope of the appeal waiver. Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw,
and we dismiss the appeal.
______________________________
1The Honorable Roseann A. Ketchmark, United States District Judge for the
Western District of Missouri.
-2-

-- 2 of 2 --