Marcus McAdams v. Craig Stalhood, Acting Warden, FCI-Forrest City, Arkansas1

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 24-2360
___________________________
Marcus McAdams
Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
Craig Stalhood, Acting Warden, FCI-Forrest City, Arkansas1
Defendant - Appellee
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Delta
____________
Submitted: July 18, 2025
Filed: July 24, 2025
[Unpublished]
____________
Before ERICKSON, STRAS, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Marcus McAdams claims he is eligible for “time credits” on one of the
consecutive sentences he is serving. 18 U.S.C. § 3632(d)(4); see 28 U.S.C. § 2241.
1 Craig Stalhood has become Acting Warden of the Federal Correctional
Institute in Forrest City, Arkansas, and is substituted as respondent under Federal
Rule of Appellate Procedure 43(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

-2-
He did not, however, exhaust all available remedies by filing a timely administrative
appeal or seeking an extension after his request was denied. See Mathena v. United
States, 577 F.3d 943, 944, 946 (8th Cir. 2009) (applying de novo review and
explaining that a prisoner must “first present[] his claim to the BOP”). Nor does he
dispute that his failure to exhaust required dismissal, see Manning v. Ryan, 13 F.4th
705, 707 n.2 (8th Cir. 2021) (per curiam), much less identify “any special
circumstances” suggesting “that [it] should not be required in this case,” Kendrick
v. Carlson, 995 F.2d 1440, 1447 (8th Cir. 1993). We accordingly affirm the
judgment of the district court.2 See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
2 The Honorable Lee P. Rudofsky, United States District Judge for the Eastern
District of Arkansas, adopting the recommended disposition of the Honorable Edie
R. Ervin, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

-- 2 of 2 --