Carsten J. Quinlan v. Daniel Puls; Cheryl Puls; Alissa Puls

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 25-2155
___________________________
Carsten J. Quinlan
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant
v.
Daniel Puls; Cheryl Puls; Alissa Puls
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the District of Minnesota
____________
Submitted: November 5, 2025
Filed: November 10, 2025
[Unpublished]
____________
Before SMITH, GRUENDER, and STRAS, Circuit Judges.
____________

-- 1 of 2 --

PER CURIAM.
Carsten Quinlan appeals the district court’s1 dismissal of his pro se civil action
for failure to state a claim. After careful review of the record, we find no basis for
reversal. See Federer v. Gephardt, 363 F.3d 754, 757 (8th Cir. 2004) (standard of
review). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
1The Honorable Ann D. Montgomery, United States District Judge for the
District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable
Douglas L. Micko, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.
-2-

-- 2 of 2 --