United States of America v. Mauro Ordaz-Moreno

14-10128Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit18 mar 2015

Testo completo

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
MAURO ORDAZ-MORENO,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 14-10128
D.C. No. 2:13-cr-00264-GMN
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Nevada
Gloria M. Navarro, Chief Judge, Presiding
Submitted March 10, 2015**
Before: FARRIS, WARDLAW, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
Mauro Ordaz-Moreno appeals from the district court’s judgment and
challenges the 30-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for
attempted reentry of a deported alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326; and fraud
FILED
MAR 18 2015
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

-- 1 of 2 --

and misuse of visas, permits, and other documents, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §
1546(a). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Ordaz-Moreno contends that his sentence is substantively unreasonable in
light of the staleness of his prior conviction and his cultural assimilation. The
district court did not abuse its discretion in imposing Ordaz-Moreno’s sentence.
See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007). The 30-month sentence at the
bottom of the Guidelines range is substantively reasonable in light of the 18 U.S.C.
§ 3553(a) sentencing factors and the totality of the circumstances, including Ordaz-
Moreno’s criminal history and the need to promote respect for the law. See Gall,
552 U.S. at 51; see also United States v. Burgos-Ortega, 2015 WL 468186, at *8
(9th Cir. Feb. 5, 2015) (noting that the defendant’s staleness argument “was taken
into account under the post-Amezcua-Vasquez Guidelines amendment reducing the
increase for a prior felony not scored from 16 to 12”).
AFFIRMED.
14-10128 2

-- 2 of 2 --

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.