Michael C. Christen v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MICHAEL C. CHRISTEN,
Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL
REVENUE,
Respondent-Appellee.
No. 16-72868
Tax Ct. No. 16147-14
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from a Decision of the
United States Tax Court
Submitted September 26, 2017**
Before: SILVERMAN, TALLMAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Michael C. Christen appeals pro se from the Tax Court’s decision, following
a bench trial, upholding the Commissioner of Internal Revenue’s determination of
deficiencies and penalties for the tax years 1999, 2000, and 2002. We have
jurisdiction under 26 U.S.C. § 7482(a). We review de novo conclusions of law and
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
FILED
OCT 3 2017
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

-- 1 of 2 --

2 16-72868
for clear error questions of fact. Hardy v. Comm’r, 181 F.3d 1002, 1004 (9th Cir.
1999). We affirm.
The Tax Court properly upheld the deficiencies for tax years 1999, 2000,
and 2002 because the Commissioner presented “some substantive evidence” that
Christen failed to report income, and Christen failed to submit any relevant
evidence, including establishing the existence of a settlement agreement, that the
“deficiency was arbitrary or erroneous.” Id. at 1004-05 (Commissioner’s
deficiency determination is presumptively correct, and it is incumbent on taxpayer
to rebut the presumption by a preponderance of the evidence).
The Tax Court properly found that penalties under 26 U.S.C. §§ 6651(a)(1)
and 6662 were appropriate for Christen’s delinquent and understated taxes. See 26
U.S.C. § 6651(a)(1) (addition appropriate when taxpayer fails to file taxes unless
such failure was due to reasonable cause and not due to willful neglect); id.
§ 6662(a), (d)(1) (authorizing penalty for substantial understatement of taxes when
understatement exceeds the greater of ten percent of the tax required to be shown
on the tax return or $5,000).
We reject as without merit Christen’s contentions that the Commissioner
engaged in spoliation of evidence.
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --