Testo completo
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JOSEPH D. ADDISON III,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
CALIFORNIA INSTITUTION FOR MEN;
et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 17-55732
D.C. No. 5:15-cv-01259-JVS-AJW
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Central District of California
James V. Selna, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted April 11, 2018**
Before: SILVERMAN, PAEZ, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.
Joseph D. Addison III, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the
district court’s order denying his post-judgment motion for reconsideration in his
42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging federal and state law claims. We have
jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion. Sch.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
FILED
APR 23 2018
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
-- 1 of 2 --
2 17-55732
Dist. No. 1J, Multnomah Cty., Or. v. ACandS, Inc., 5 F.3d 1255, 1262 (9th Cir.
1993). We affirm.
The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Addison’s motion
for reconsideration because Addison failed to establish any basis for such relief.
See id. at 1263 (setting forth grounds for reconsideration under Fed. R. Civ. P.
60(b)).
AFFIRMED.
-- 2 of 2 --
