United States of America v. Alexander Greybull

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
ALEXANDER GREYBULL,
Defendant-Appellant.
No. 19-30073
D.C. No. 1:18-cr-00020-SPW-1
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Montana
Susan P. Watters, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted October 15, 2019**
Before: FARRIS, LEAVY, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
Alexander Greybull appeals from the district court’s judgment and
challenges the 180-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea convictions
for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of
21 U.S.C. § 846; possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine and
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
FILED
OCT 23 2019
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

-- 1 of 2 --

2 19-30073
cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a); possession of a firearm during a drug
trafficking offense, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c); and being a felon in
possession of a firearm and ammunition, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g).
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Greybull’s counsel has filed
a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw
as counsel of record. We have provided Greybull the opportunity to file a pro se
supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been
filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.
75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --