United States v. 2020-10-29 | 20-10016 | USA V. ABDUL SABOOR | nonprecedential | memorandum disposition |

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

ABDUL SABOOR,

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 20-10016

D.C. No. 3:19-cr-08011-SPL-1

MEMORANDUM
*

Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Arizona
Steven P. Logan, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 26, 2020
**

Before: McKEOWN, RAWLINSON, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

Abdul Saboor appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges his
guilty-plea conviction and 37-month sentence for conspiracy, in violation of 18
U.S.C. § 371. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Saboor’s
counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a

*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
FILED

OCT 29 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

2 20-10016
motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Saboor the
opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or
answering brief has been filed.
Saboor waived his right to appeal his conviction and sentence. Our
independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80
(1988), discloses no arguable issue as to the validity of the waiver. See United
States v. Watson, 582 F.3d 974, 986-88 (9th Cir. 2009). We accordingly dismiss
the appeal. See id. at 988.
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
DISMISSED.