Testo completo
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
LUZVIMINDA LOLA ERWIN, AKA
Luzviminda Dolang Lola,
Petitioner,
v.
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 14-72325
Agency No. A200-160-164
ORDER
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted October 10, 2018
*
University of Hawaii Manoa
Before: WARDLAW, BERZON, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
The panel has voted to grant Erwin’s petition for panel rehearing in light of
this court’s en banc decision in Torres v. Barr, No. 13-70653, 2020 WL 5668478
(9th Cir. Sept. 24, 2020) (en banc) (overruling Minto v. Sessions, 854 F.3d 619 (9th
Cir. 2017)). The prior memorandum disposition (Dkt. 57) in this case is vacated.
Erwin’s petition for rehearing en banc is denied as moot.
*
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
FILED
NOV 4 2020
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2
Erwin’s petition for review of the order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals is remanded to the agency to determine in the first instance whether
alternative grounds for removability exist under 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(6)(A)(i).
The petition for panel rehearing is GRANTED and the case is
REMANDED for further proceedings not inconsistent with this order.