Noyes v. University Realty, Inc.

CourtListener 3327481Connappct8 feb 1984

Testo completo

Per Curiam.

The appellant did not appear to argue this appeal on the date the case was assigned for hearing. Subsequently, a motion to reargue was denied by the court because we were not persuaded that the reasons given for the appellant’s absence warranted reargument.

Furthermore, a review of the record and briefs indicates that there was no error.

There is no error.

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.