EEOC Appeal 2025001072

2025001072Eeoc

Testo completo

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION
Office of Federal Sector
P.O. Box 77960
Washington, DC 20013
Luann L.,1
Complainant,
v.
Adam Telle,
Acting Secretary,
Department of the Army,
Agency.
Appeal No. 2025001072
Hearing No. 531-2024-00036X
Agency No. ARASC23JAN00799
DECISION
Complainant filed an appeal with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
(EEOC or Commission), pursuant to 29 C.F.R. § 1614.403(a), from the Agency’s
November 21, 2024, final order concerning her equal employment opportunity
(EEO) complaint of employment discrimination in violation of Section 501 of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Rehabilitation Act), as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 791 et seq.
For the following reasons, the Commission AFFIRMS the Agency’s final order.
At the time of events, giving rise to this complaint, Complainant worked as a Traffic
Management Specialist in the Agency’s Transportation Division, Official Travel
Branch, Logistics Readiness Center at Fort Belvoir, Virginia. On April 21, 2023,
Complainant filed an EEO complaint alleging that the Agency subjected her to
discrimination and a hostile work environment based on her disability (physical) and
1 	This 	case 	has 	been 	randomly 	assigned 	a 	pseudonym 	which 	will 	replace
Complainant’s 	name 	when 	the 	decision 	is 	published 	to 	non-parties 	and 	the
Commission’s website.
2025001072	2
reprisal (prior protected EEO activity) with respect to assignments, duty hours, time
and attendance matters, suspension, discipline and request for accommodation.2
At the conclusion of the investigation, the Agency provided Complainant with a
copy of the report of investigation and notice of her right to request a hearing before
an EEOC Administrative Judge (AJ). Complainant timely requested a hearing. The
AJ granted the Agency’s motion and issued a summary judgment decision finding
that Complainant was not subjected to discrimination or reprisal as alleged. The
Agency subsequently issued a final order fully adopting the AJ’s decision. 	The
instant appeal followed.
Having thoroughly reviewed the record and construing any inferences raised by the
undisputed facts in favor of Complainant, we find that a reasonable factfinder could
not find in Complainant’s favor. We find that aside from Complainant’s bare
assertions, the record is devoid of evidence that many of allegations occurred as
alleged. With respect to the remaining incidents, even assuming they occurred as
described by Complainant, they were more likely the result of routine supervision,
personality conflicts, and general workplace disputes and tribulations and are
therefore insufficiently severe or pervasive to establish a discriminatory hostile work
environment and not sufficiently material to deter protected activity to establish a
retaliatory hostile work environment. Furthermore, the record is devoid of evidence
beyond Complainant’s mere speculation and suspicion that the alleged conduct was
based on discriminatory or retaliatory animus.
We also find that Complainant failed to establish that the explanations for the
employment actions at issue herein were a pretext for discriminatory or retaliatory
animus. Lastly, the record is devoid of evidence establishing that Complainant
requested accommodation or was denied accommodation.
Upon careful review of the AJ’s decision and the evidence of record, including
arguments on appeal, we conclude that the AJ correctly determined that the
preponderance of the evidence did not establish that Complainant was discriminated
against by the Agency as alleged. Accordingly, we AFFIRM the Agency’s final
order implementing the AJ’s decision.
2 Complainant also included her termination as part of her original complaint.
However, the termination claim was processed separately as a mixed case complaint.
2025001072	3
STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL
RECONSIDERATION (M1125)
The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider this appellate decision if
Complainant or the Agency submits a written request that contains arguments or
evidence that tend to establish that:
1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of
material fact or law; or
2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,
practices, or operations of the agency.
Requests for reconsideration must be filed with EEOC’s Office of Federal Sector
(OFS) within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of this decision. 	If the party
requesting reconsideration elects to file a statement or brief in support of the request,
that 	statement 	or 	brief 	must 	be 	filed 	together 	with 	the 	request 	for
reconsideration. 	A party shall have twenty (20) calendar days from receipt of
another party’s request for reconsideration within which to submit a brief or
statement in opposition. See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity
Management Directive for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), at Chap. 9 § VII.B
(Aug. 5, 2015).
Complainant should submit their request for reconsideration, and any statement or
brief in support of their request, via the EEOC Public Portal, which can be found at
https://publicportal.eeoc.gov/Portal/Login.aspx. 	Alternatively, Complainant can
submit their request and arguments to the Director, Office of Federal Sector, Equal
Employment Opportunity Commission, via regular mail addressed to P.O. Box
77960, Washington, DC 20013, or by certified mail addressed to 131 M Street, NE,
Washington, DC 20507. 	In the absence of a legible postmark, a complainant’s
request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if OFS receives it by mail within
five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period. See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.604.
An agency’s request for reconsideration must be submitted in digital format via the
EEOC’s Federal Sector EEO Portal (FedSEP). See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.403(g).
2025001072	4
Either party’s request and/or statement or brief in opposition must also include proof
of service on the other party, unless Complainant files their request via the EEOC
Public Portal, in which case no proof of service is required.
Failure to file within the 30-day time period will result in dismissal of the party’s
request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances prevented
the timely filing of the request. 	Any supporting documentation must be
submitted together with the request for reconsideration. 	The Commission will
consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only in very limited
circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.604(f).
COMPLAINANT’S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0124)
You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court
within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive this decision. 	If
you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in the complaint the person
who is the official Agency head or department head, identifying that person by their
full name and official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case
in court. 	“Agency” or “department” means the national organization, and not the
local office, facility or department in which you work. If you file a request to
reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil action will terminate the
administrative processing of your complaint.
RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0815)
If you want to file a civil action but cannot pay the fees, costs, or security to do so,
you may request permission from the court to proceed with the civil action without
paying these fees or costs. Similarly, if you cannot afford an attorney to represent
you in the civil action, you may request the court to appoint an attorney for you. You
must submit the requests for waiver of court costs or appointment of an
attorney directly to the court, not the Commission. The court has the sole
discretion to grant or deny these types of requests.
2025001072	5
Such requests do not alter the time limits for filing a civil action (please read the
paragraph titled Complainant’s Right to File a Civil Action for the specific time
limits).
FOR THE COMMISSION:
T. Gimbrere __________ 	Acting Director's signature
T. Gimbrere, Acting Director
Office of Federal Sector
September 24, 2026
Date

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.