CourtListener 9425040•In Re: Amendments to Florida Rule of General Practice and Judicial Administration 2.320
In Re: Amendments to Florida Rule of General Practice and Judicial Administration 2.320
CourtListener 9425040Fla7 set 2023
Testo completo
Supreme Court of Florida
THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 7, 2023
In Re: Amendments to Florida SC2023-0114
Rule of General Practice and
Judicial Administration 2.320
The Court has considered the comments concerning Florida
Rule of General Practice and Judicial Administration 2.320, which
was amended in the opinion issued February 2, 2023. The Court
having determined that no further amendments to the rule are
warranted at this time, this case is hereby final.
MUÑIZ, C.J., and CANADY, COURIEL, GROSSHANS, and
FRANCIS, JJ., concur.
LABARGA, J., dissents with an opinion.
SASSO, J., did not participate.
LABARGA, J., dissenting.
Earlier this year, on its own motion, the majority adopted
amendments to Florida Rule of General Practice and Judicial
Administration 2.320. In doing so, the majority expressly
eliminated fairness and diversity education from the judicial
education requirements for Florida judges. At that time, I dissented
to the amendments as “unwarranted, untimely, and ill-advised.” In
re Amends. to Fla. Rule of Gen. Prac. & Jud. Admin. 2.320, 356 So.
CASE NO.: SC2023-0114
Page Two
3d 766, 769 (Fla. 2023) (Labarga, J., dissenting). Now, having
considered the comments filed in response to the amendments, the
majority has decided to leave the amendments in place and take no
further action.
I continue to believe that fairness and diversity education is of
great benefit to Florida’s judiciary and those who interact with
Florida’s state courts. To that end, I dissent to today’s order and
reaffirm my belief that “the purpose of providing express
consideration to fairness and diversity education has been to
complement the canons [in the Code of Judicial Conduct], and in
the hopes of addressing the extremely complex issue that is
discrimination, to educate the judiciary on strategies for recognizing
and combatting discrimination.” Id.
I respectfully dissent.
A True Copy
Test:
SC2023-0114 9/7/2023
SC2023-0114 9/7/2023
CASE NO.: SC2023-0114
Page Three
SO
Served:
JOSHUA E. DOYLE
MERRICK L. GROSS
GISELLE GUTIERREZ
HON. STEPHEN RICHARD JEWETT
JORDI C. MARTÍNEZ-CID
KEITH H. PARK
PAUL R. REGENSDORF
KELLY NOEL SMITH
ELIZABETH CLARK TARBERT
Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude
Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.