Lott v. Metzger et al

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA
MIKE LOTT,
Plaintiff,
v.
JULIA METZGER; the STATE OF
ALASKA; and the STATE OF ALASKA,
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,
Defendants.
Case No. 4:22-cv-00001-JMK
ORDER OF DISMISSAL & NOTICE OF STRIKE
Mike Lott, a self-represented prisoner, (“Plaintiff”) initially filed a Prisoner’s
Complaint under the Civil Rights Act (42 U.S.C. § 1983) on January 11, 2022.1 He
then filed a First and Second Amended Complaint and several motions.2 	The
Court screened Plaintiff’s filings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. 	In the Second
Screening Order, the Court again found Plaintiff’s filings deficient, denied all the
pending motions, dismissed Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint, and granted
“limited, conditional leave to amend.”3 	On November 4, 2022, Plaintiff Mike Lott,
a self-represented prisoner, filed a “NOTICE of Filing State Court Documents”
1 Docket 1.
2 Docket 5–10, 12–18.
3 Docket 19 at 13. An amended complaint replaces the prior complaint in its entity. See D. Alaska
Loc. Civ. R. 15.1; Ramirez v. Cnty. of San Bernardino, 806 F.3d 1002, 1008 (9th Cir. 2015).
Case 4:22-cv-00001-JMK Document 23 Filed 03/01/23 Page 1 of 2

Case No. 4:22-cv-00001-JMK, Lott v. Metzger et al
Order of Dismissal & Notice of Strike
Page 2 of 2
which included four pages of documents.4 On January 10, 2023, the Court notified
Plaintiff of its intent to dismiss the action with prejudice, but in the interests of
justice, provided Plaintiff with 30 days to voluntarily dismiss this action to avoid
receiving a strike as required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).5 Plaintiff failed to follow the
instructions in the Court’s notice and the Court must now dismiss Plaintiff’s case.
Because amendment to Plaintiff’s filings would be futile, this action is DISMISSED
WITH PREJUDICE.6
This dismissal will count as a “strike” against Plaintiff under § 1915(g). After
three strikes, Plaintiff will be unable to file lawsuits under in forma pauperis status,
unless he demonstrates “imminent danger of serious physical injury.”7
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED:
1. 	This action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
2. 	All pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT.
3. 	This dismissal counts as a strike under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
4. 	The Clerk of Court shall issue a final judgement.
DATED this 1 st day of March, 2023, at Anchorage, Alaska.
/s/ Joshua M. Kindred
JOSHUA M. KINDRED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
4 Docket 21.
5 Docket 22.
6 Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 489 (2000); Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
7 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
Case 4:22-cv-00001-JMK Document 23 Filed 03/01/23 Page 2 of 2