Friddle v. Thomas et al

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
WO
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Danny Friddle,
Plaintiff,
v.
Todd Thomas, et al.,
Defendants.
No. CV-23-01072-PHX-KML (CDB)
ORDER
Plaintiff Danny Friddle seeks reconsideration of this court’s November 13, 2025,
order. (Doc. 138.) Friddle has not met the high standard for reconsideration. See Sch. Dist.
No. 1J, Multnomah Cnty., Or. v. ACandS, Inc., 5 F.3d 1255, 1263 (9th Cir. 1993)
(reconsideration requires newly discovered evidence, clear error, or change in controlling
law).
IT IS ORDERED the Motion for Reconsideration (Doc. 152) is DENIED.
Dated this 21st day of January, 2026.
Case 2:23-cv-01072-KML-CDB Document 154 Filed 01/21/26 Page 1 of 1