Majak v. Starbucks Corporation

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
WO
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Abuk Majak,
Plaintiff,
v.
Starbucks Corporation,
Defendant.
No. CV-25-01850-PHX-JAT
ORDER
On November 5, 2025, the Court issued an Order which concluded:
IT IS ORDERED granting the stipulation [to proceed to arbitration]
(Doc. 15). The parties are ordered to proceed expeditiously to arbitration.
This case is stayed pending arbitration.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, within 60 days of the date of this
Order, the parties shall file a joint status report. The status report must
include the schedule for arbitration, including the date of the arbitration
hearing.
(Doc. 16).
On January 5, 2026, Plaintiff filed a status report requesting time to find new counsel
and file a demand for arbitration. (Doc. 18). Defendant does not oppose this additional
time request. Plaintiff also requested a status conference. (Doc. 19).
To allow Plaintiff time to find new counsel,
IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff has until February 19, 2026, file her demand for
arbitration. Plaintiff must comply with this deadline even if she is unable to find new
counsel.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if Haley Carr, Esq., or Ken Franks, Esq., do not
Case 2:25-cv-01850-JAT Document 20 Filed 01/08/26 Page 1 of 2

- 2 -
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
intend to continue their representation of Plaintiff, they must (each) move to withdraw by
February 17, 2026. Any such motion must comply with Local Rule Civil 83.3.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall jointly file a status report by
March 2, 2026. The status report must include the arbitration schedule including the date
of the arbitration hearing.
IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s request for a status hearing (Doc. 19)
is denied without prejudice.
Dated this 8th day of January, 2026.
Case 2:25-cv-01850-JAT Document 20 Filed 01/08/26 Page 2 of 2