Strole v. Arizona Attorney General's Office

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
WO
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Sherri Strole,
Plaintiff,
v.
Arizona Attorney General’s Office,
Defendant.
No. CV-24-08209-PCT-JJT
ORDER
At issue is Plaintiff’s Motion for Waiver of All Fees and Costs (Including
Reproduction Costs for Case Files, Transcripts, and Recordings), and Motion to Reinstate
Case and Consolidate and Expand or Assign Legal Counsel (Doc. 33). Plaintiff requests,
inter alia, for this Court to reinstate this matter because she was “unable to meet the
traditional and restricted (by clerks) service requirement that led to dismissal.” (Doc. 33 at
2.) Lack of service did not lead to the dismissal of Plaintiff’s claims here; rather, her Second
Amendment Complaint was ultimately dismissed on ripeness grounds (Doc. 17 at 7.)
Having presented no germane justification for reinstatement, this matter will remain closed.
Plaintiff’s other requested relief—that she be assigned legal counsel, that she be permitted
to proceed in forma pauperis despite already being granted that status (Doc. 12), and that
this matter be consolidated with a state case—are rendered futile by the closed status of
this matter.
. . .
. . .
Case 3:24-cv-08209-JJT Document 34 Filed 12/08/25 Page 1 of 2

- 2 -
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED denying Plaintiff’s Motion for Waiver of All Fees
and Costs (Including Reproduction Costs for Case Files, Transcripts, and Recordings), and
Motion to Reinstate Case and Consolidate and Expand or Assign Legal Counsel (Doc. 33).
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED directing the Clerk of Court not to accept any further
filings in this closed case.
Dated this 8th day of December, 2025.
Honorable John J. Tuchi
United States District Judge
Case 3:24-cv-08209-JJT Document 34 Filed 12/08/25 Page 2 of 2