(PC) Price v. San Joaquin County et al

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
EUGENE LEON PRICE,
Plaintiff,
v.
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY, et al.,
Defendants.
Case No. 2:25-cv-2809-DC-JDP (PC)
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
(ECF No. 19)
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On September 3, 2026, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein
which were served on plaintiff, and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the
findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. ECF No. 19. Plaintiff has
not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.
The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602
F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo.
See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law by the
magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court . . . .”).
Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by
Case 2:25-cv-02809-DC-JDP Document 22 Filed 10/14/26 Page 1 of 2

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
the record and by the proper analysis.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The findings and recommendations filed September 3, 2026, ECF No. 19, are
ADOPTED;
2. This action is DISMISSED for failure to prosecute and failure to state a claim; and
3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: October 13, 2026	___________________________
Dena Coggins
United States District Judge
Case 2:25-cv-02809-DC-JDP Document 22 Filed 10/14/26 Page 2 of 2