Giuseppe Pampena v. Elon R.Musk

1 printed pages contain little extracted OCR body text; searchable legal-body completeness has not been established for those pages.

OCR transcription for search; preserved printed pages are authoritative

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

AUTHENTI!
U.S. GOVER
INFORMA]

Case 3:22-cv-05937-CRB Document 569

COTCHETT, PITRE & MCCARTHY, LLP
Joseph W. Cotchett (SBN 36324)

DN
PO

Filed 04/22/26 Page1of6

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
SULLIVAN, LLP

jcotchett@cpmlegal.com Alex Spiro (pro hac vice)
Mark C. Molumphy (SBN 168009) alexspiro@quinnemanuel.com
mmolumphy@cpmlegal.com Ellyde R. Thompson (pro hac vice)
Tyson C. Redenbarger (SBN 294424) ellydethompson@quinnemanuel.com
tredenbarger@cpmlegal.com Jesse A. Bernstein (pro hac vice)
Elle D. Lewis (SBN 238329) jessebernstein@quinnemanuel.com
elewis@cpmlegal.com 295 Fifth Ave., New York, NY 10010
Gia Jung (SBN 340160) Telephone: (212) 849-7000
gjung@cpmlegal.com Facsimile: (212) 849-7100
Caroline A. Yuen (SBN 354388)
cyuen@cpmlegal.com Michael T. Lifrak (Bar No. 210846)
San Francisco Airport Office Center michaellifrak@quinnemanuel.com
840 Malcolm Road, Suite 200 Stephen A. Broome (Bar No. 314605)
Burlingame, California 94010 stephenbroome@quinnemanuel.com
Telephone: (650) 697-6000 Alex Bergjans (Bar No. 302830)
alexbergjans@quinnemanuel.com
BOTTINI & BOTTINEL INC. 865 S. Figueroa Street, 10th Floor
Francis A. Bottini, Jr. (SBN 175783) Los Angeles, California 90017
fbottini@bottinilaw.com Telephone: (213) 443-3000
Aaron Arnzen (SBN 218272) Facsimile: (213) 443-3100
aarnzen@bottinilaw.com
7817 Ivanhoe Avenue, Suite 102 Attorneys for Defendant Elon Musk
La Jolla, California 92037
Telephone: (858) 914-2001
Attorneys for Lead Plaintiff
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
GIUSEPPE PAMPENA, on behalf of CASE NO. 3:22-CV-05937-CRB
himself and all others similarly situated,
STIPULATION AND [
Plaintiff, ORDER ENLARGING PAGE LIMITS
FOR DEFENDANT’S RULE 50(B) AND 59
VS. MOTIONS
ELON R. MUSK, Hon. Judge Charles R. Breyer
Defendant.
reo 7 Case No. 3:22-CV-05937-CRB

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED} ORDER ENLARGING PAGE LIMITS

Case 3:22-cv-05937-CRB Document569_ Filed 04/22/26 Page 2of6

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-1- 	Case No. 3:22-CV-05937-CRB
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER ENLARGING PAGE LIMITS
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
1. 	Pursuant to Local Civil Rules 7-11, the Parties jointly enter into this Stipulation requesting
an enlargement of the page limits as to the parties’ briefing on Defendant’s anticipated combined Rule
50(b) renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law, and Rule 59 motion for new trial.
2. 	This Court’s Standing Order I.C. provides that a brief in support or in opposition to Rule
50(b) and 59 motions may not exceed fifteen pages in length without leave of the Court and good cause.
3. 	The Parties have conferred and agree that, given the number of issues and arguments that
the Defendant seeks to raise through these combined motions (including argument regarding each of the
five elements of Plaintiffs’ 10b-5 claim and corresponding jury instructions), an additional fifteen pages
is warranted for the combined motions and opposition briefs. The Court has previously expanded the page
limits for other dispositive motions in this case, including the Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 32), Motion
for Class Certification (Dkt. No. 82), and Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 232), on similar
grounds.
NOW, 	THEREFORE, 	IT 	IS 	HEREBY 	STIPULATED 	AND 	THE 	PARTIES 	JOINTLY
REQUEST that the Court extend the page limits for Defendant’s combined Rule 50(b) and 59 Motions
and Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Defendant’s Motions, each to thirty pages, not including, title pages, indexes
of cases, table of contents, exhibits, affidavits and summaries of argument. Defendant’s Reply Brief in
Support of the Motions for judgment as a matter of law and for new trial shall have a page limit of fifteen
pages.
Case 3:22-cv-05937-CRB Document 569 Filed 04/22/26 Page 3 of 6

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2- 	Case No. 3:22-CV-05937-CRB
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER ENLARGING PAGE LIMITS
DATED: April 17, 2026
/s/ Alex Spiro 	/s/ Joseph W. Cotchett
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
SULLIVAN, LLP
Alex Spiro (pro hac vice)
alexspiro@quinnemanuel.com
Jesse A. Bernstein (pro hac vice)
jessebernstein@quinnemanuel.com
Stephanie Keleman (pro hac vice)
stephaniekeleman@quinnemanuel.com
51 Madison Ave 22nd floor
New York, NY 10010
Telephone: (212) 849-7000
Facsimile: (212) 849-7100
COTCHETT, PITRE & MCCARTHY, LLP
Joseph W. Cotchett (SBN 36324)
jcotchett@cpmlegal.com
Mark C. Molumphy (SBN 168009)
mmolumphy@cpmlegal.com
Tyson C. Redenbarger (SBN 294424)
tredenbarger@cpmlegal.com
Elle D. Lewis (SBN 238329)
elewis@cpmlegal.com
Gia Jung (SBN 340160)
gjung@cpmlegal.com
Caroline A. Yuen (SBN 354388)
cyuen@cpmlegal.com
San Francisco Airport Office Center
840 Malcolm Road, Suite 200
Burlingame, California 94010
Telephone: (650) 697-6000
Michael T. Lifrak (Bar No. 210846)
michaellifrak@quinnemanuel.com
Joseph C. Sarles (Bar No. 254750)
josephsarles@quinnemanuel.com
Alex Bergjans (Bar No. 302830)
alexbergjans@quinnemanuel.com
865 S. Figueroa Street, 10th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90017
Telephone: (213) 443-3000
Facsimile: (213) 443-3100
/s/ Francis A. Bottini
BOTTINI & BOTTINI, INC.
Francis A. Bottini, Jr. (SBN 175783)
fbottini@bottinilaw.com
Aaron Arnzen (SBN 218272)
aarnzen@bottinilaw.com
7817 Ivanhoe Avenue, Suite 102
La Jolla, California 92037
Telephone: (858) 914-2001
Attorneys for Defendant Elon Musk 	Attorneys for Lead Plaintiffs
Case 3:22-cv-05937-CRB Document 569 Filed 04/22/26 Page 4 of 6

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3- 	Case No. 3:22-CV-05937-CRB
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER ENLARGING PAGE LIMITS
ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL RULE 5-1(i)(3)
I, Alex Bergjans, attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the
other signatories. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that
the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed this 17 day of April 2026, at Los Angeles, California.
By /s/ Alex Bergjans
Alex Bergjans
Case 3:22-cv-05937-CRB Document 569 Filed 04/22/26 Page 5 of 6

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-4- 	Case No. 3:22-CV-05937-CRB
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER ENLARGING PAGE LIMITS
ORDER
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: 	By
Hon. Charles R. Breyer
United States District Judge
U
N
I
T
E
D
S
T
A
T
E
S
D
I
S
T
R
ICT
C
O
U
R
T
N
O
R
T
H
E
R N D I S
T
R
I
C
T
O
F
C
A
L
I
F
O
R
N
I
A
IT IS SO ORDERED
Judge Charles R. Breyer
April 22, 2026
Case 3:22-cv-05937-CRB Document 569 Filed 04/22/26 Page 6 of 6