USA v. Baquedano, et al

3:24-mj-71769Cand11 dic 2025

Testo completo

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING
24-MJ-71769
Shaffy Moeel [CSBN 238732]
Moeel Lah Fakhoury LLP
2006 Kala Bagai Way, Suite 16
Berkeley, CA 94704
Phone: 510-500-9994
shaffy@mlf-llp.com
Attorneys for Defendant
Onesimo Danilo Cholula Gonzalez
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
vs.
ONESIMO DANILO CHOLULA
GONZALEZ,
Defendant.
Case No.: 24-MJ-71769
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING
Mr. Gonzalez is set for a status hearing before this Court on December 16, 2025 at 10:30
a.m. The parties agree that a continuance of the status conference is needed to allow for
production and review. The government has produced a very large volume of discovery, including
for events across many months and extensive wiretap evidence. There are also voluminous
financial records, reaching many hundreds of pages, that require redaction by the government.
The parties thus stipulate and request that the Court re-set this matter for January 22, 2026.
Thus, the parties stipulate to the following:
Case 3:24-mj-71769-MRGD Document 74 Filed 12/11/25 Page 1 of 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING
24-MJ-71769
1) The defendant excludes time of all applicable time periods under the Speedy Trial
Act from December 16, 2025, through January 22, 2026.
2) The parties further agree that time should be excluded in order to provide reasonable
time necessary for effective preparation of counsel, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
3161(h)(7)(B)(iv).
3) The parties further stipulate and agree that the ends of justice served by excluding the
time from December 16, 2025 through January 22, 2026, from computation under the
Speedy Trial Act outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a
speedy trial. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), (B)(iv).
4) The parties further stipulate that, with the consent of the defendant, there is good
cause for extending the time limits for a preliminary hearing under Federal Rule of
Criminal Procedure 5.1. See Fed. R. Crim. P. 5.1(d).
Counsel for Mr. Gonzalez certify that they obtained approval from government counsel to
file this stipulation and proposed order.
SO STIPULATED.
DATED: December 11, 2025 CRAIG MISSAKIAN
United States Attorney
/s/
KENNETH CHAMBERS
Assistant United States Attorney
/s/
SHAFFY MOEEL
MOEEL LAH FAKHOURY LLP
Attorneys for Mr. Gonzalez
Case 3:24-mj-71769-MRGD Document 74 Filed 12/11/25 Page 2 of 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING
24-MJ-71769
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Accordingly, and for good cause shown, THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
Based on the reasons provided in the stipulation of the parties above, and for good cause
shown, the Court orders that Mr. Gonzalez’s status hearing be re-set to January 21, 2026 at 10:30
a.m.
The Court further finds good cause to exclude all applicable time periods under the
Speedy Trial Act from December 16, 2025, through January 21, 2026.
The Court finds that there is good cause for extending the time limits for a preliminary
hearing under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 5.1. See Fed. R. Crim. P. 5.1(d).
The Court further finds that failure to exclude time would unreasonably deny the
defendant and his counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into
account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv).
Thus, the Court finds that the ends of justice served by excluding the time from
December 16, 2025 through January 21, 2026, from computation under the Speedy Trial Act
outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. 18 U.S.C. §
3161(h)(7)(A), (B)(iv).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: _________________________________
HON. THOMAS S. HIXSON
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
December 11, 2025
Case 3:24-mj-71769-MRGD Document 74 Filed 12/11/25 Page 3 of 3

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.