4:16-cv-05544•Peter Schuman et al v. Microchip Technology Incorporated et al
Peter Schuman et al v. Microchip Technology Incorporated et al
4:16-cv-05544Cand18 nov 2025
Testo completo
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 4:16-cv-05544-HSG Stipulation to Revise Briefing and Hearing Schedule on Defendants’ Motion to Decertify the Class Michael Rubin (SBN 80618) Matthew Murray (SBN 271461) ALTSHULER BERZON LLP 177 Post Street, Suite 300 San Francisco, CA 94108 Telephone: (415) 421-7151 Facsimile: (415) 362-8064 Email: mrubin@altber.com mmurray@altber.com Cliff Palefsky (SBN 77683) Keith Ehrman (SBN 106985) MCGUINN, HILLSMAN & PALEFSKY 535 Pacific Avenue San Francisco, CA 94133 Telephone: (415) 421-9292 Facsimile: (415) 403-0202 Email: cp@mhpsf.com keith@mhpsf.com William B. Reilly (SBN 177550) LAW OFFICE OF WILLIAM REILLY 86 Molino Avenue Mill Valley, CA 94941 Telephone: (415) 225-6215 Facsimile: (415) 634-2897 Email: bill@williambreilly.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs (Counsel for Defendants listed on the next page) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION PETER SCHUMAN, an individual, and WILLIAM COPLIN, an individual, on behalf of themselves and on behalf of others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED, a corporation; ATMEL CORPORATION, a corporation; and ATMEL CORPORATION U.S. SEVERANCE GUARANTEE BENEFIT PROGRAM, an employee benefit plan, Defendants. Case No. 4:16-CV-05544-HSG CLASS ACTION LOCAL RULE 6-2 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO REVISE BRIEFING AND HEARING SCHEDULE ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DECERTIFY CLASS (as modified) (Current) Hearing Date: December 18, 2025 at 2:00 p.m. Case 4:16-cv-05544-HSG Document 220 Filed 11/18/25 Page 1 of 5
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 4:16-cv-05544-HSG Stipulation to Revise Briefing and Hearing Schedule on Defendants’ Motion to Decertify the Class OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C., SBN 00504800 Mark G. Kisicki, Esq. (CA SBN 150057) mark.kisicki@ogletreedeakins.com Elizabeth M. Soveranez (AZ SBN 024009) admitted pro hac vice elizabeth.soveranez@ogletreedeakins.com Esplanade Center III, Suite 800 2415 East Camelback Road Phoenix, AZ 85016 Tel.: 602.778.3700 Fax: 602.778.3750 Mark Schmidtke (IN SBN 1733-45) admitted pro hac vice 56 S. Washington Street, Suite 302 Valparaiso, IN 46383 Tel.: 219.242.8668 Fax: 219.242.8669 mark.schmidtke@ogletreedeakins.com Erika L. Leonard (GA SBN 565965) admitted pro hac vice 301 Congress Avenue, Suite 1150 Austin, TX 78701 Tel.: 512.344.4700 Fax: 512.344.4701 erika.leonard@ogletree.com Attorneys for Defendants Case 4:16-cv-05544-HSG Document 220 Filed 11/18/25 Page 2 of 5
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 Case No. 4:16-cv-05544-HSG Stipulation to Revise Briefing and Hearing Schedule on Defendants’ Motion to Decertify the Class STIPULATION TO REVISE BRIEFING AND HEARING SCHEDULE ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DECERTIFY CLASS The parties hereby stipulate and jointly ask the Court to order the following revised schedule for briefing and hearing on Defendants’ recently filed Motion to Decertify Class (ECF 218): - Plaintiffs’ Opposition to the Motion to Decertify the Class shall be due December 19, 2025; - Defendants’ Reply shall be due January 9, 2026; - The hearing on Defendants’ Motion to Decertify the Class shall be reset to January 22, 2026. Counsel arguing the motion shall appear in person, while other counsel may appear remotely. Pursuant to Local Rule 6-2, in support of this stipulated change in deadlines, the parties state as follows: On November 13, 2025, Defendants filed a Motion to Decertify Class and noticed it for the next available hearing date on the Court’s calendar, December 18, 2025. ECF 218. Under the default schedule for noticed motions, Plaintiffs’ opposition would be due on Friday, November 28, 2025, the day after Thanksgiving. ECF 218; LR 7-3(a). Plaintiffs’ counsel have pre-scheduled travel and time out of the office the full week of Thanksgiving. They also have many other pressing deadlines in this and other cases in the coming weeks, including a December 8, 2025 deadline to respond to Defendants’ petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court in this case. These holiday plans and other deadlines together made it infeasible for counsel to prepare and file an opposition to the motion to decertify by the day after Thanksgiving, and Plaintiffs’ counsel therefore reached out to counsel for Defendants to propose a stipulation to extend their opposition deadline by three weeks, to December 19, 2025, to allow adequate time to prepare a response. Defendants agreed to Plaintiffs’ request and requested in turn that, given the winter holidays, their reply deadline be extended to January 9, 2026. Plaintiffs have agreed. To account for this revised briefing schedule, and subject to the Court’s approval, the parties have agreed to reset the hearing on Defendants’ Motion to Decertify to January 22, 2026. Case 4:16-cv-05544-HSG Document 220 Filed 11/18/25 Page 3 of 5
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Case No. 4:16-cv-05544-HSG Stipulation to Revise Briefing and Hearing Schedule on Defendants’ Motion to Decertify the Class Counsel arguing the motion are available to attend in person. At least one counsel from Defendants who will not be arguing the motion requests permission to attend remotely, given scheduling and travel constraints. The parties have previously stipulated and filed unopposed motions to modify various briefing schedules in this case. ECF 20, 21, 36, 37, 78, 79, 141, 142. There have been no prior modifications of the briefing schedule for Defendants’ Motion to Decertify. The stipulated revision to the briefing and hearing schedule will not otherwise affect the schedule in this case, as the trial has not yet been set. Dated: November 17, 2025 Respectfully submitted, ALTSHULER BERZON LLP MICHAEL RUBIN MATTHEW J. MURRAY MCGUINN, HILLSMAN & PALEFSKY CLIFF PALEFSKY KEITH EHRMAN LAW OFFICE OF WILLIAM REILLY WILLIAM REILLY By: /s/ Michael Rubin Michael Rubin Attorneys for Plaintiffs OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C. By: /s/ Mark G. Kisicki (with permission) Mark G. Kisicki Elizabeth M. Soveranez 2415 East Camelback Road, Suite 800 Phoenix, AZ 85016 Mark Schmidtke 56 S. Washington Street, Suite 302 Valparaiso, IN 46383 Erika L. Leonard 301 Congress Avenue, Suite 1150 Austin, TX 78701 Attorneys for Defendants Case 4:16-cv-05544-HSG Document 220 Filed 11/18/25 Page 4 of 5
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 Case No. 4:16-cv-05544-HSG Stipulation to Revise Briefing and Hearing Schedule on Defendants’ Motion to Decertify the Class Local Rule 5-1(i)(3) E-Signature Attestation I attest that each of the other Signatories have concurred in the filing of this document. /s/ Michael Rubin Michael Rubin Order PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. Counsel who will not argue the motion may appear remotely via Public Zoom Webinar. Counsel may access the webinar information at https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/hsg. Date: 11/18/2025 THE HONORABLE HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. United States District Court Judge Northern District of California Case 4:16-cv-05544-HSG Document 220 Filed 11/18/25 Page 5 of 5
Ti chiedi come si applica questo testo alla tua situazione?
Consulenza gratuita, senza impegno
Descrivi la tua situazione. Il nostro team ti ricontatterà via e-mail per la tua consulenza.
Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude
Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.