Abrams v. PG&E Corporation et al

4:25-cv-09155Cand19 feb 2026

Testo completo

Case No. 25-cv-09155-HSG
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
William B. Abrams
end2endconsulting@gmail.com
625 McDonald Ave.
Santa Rosa, CA, 95404
Tel: 707 397 5727
Pro Se Fire Victim Claimant and Party to related proceedings before the California Public Utilities
Commission
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
OAKLAND DIVISION
WILLIAM B. ABRAMS on behalf of
himself and all others similarly situated,
Pro Se Fire Victim Appellant,
v.
PG&E CORPORATION, PACIFIC GAS
AND ELECTRIC COMPANY,
Appellees.
Case No. 25-cv-09155-HSG
Transferred from: BAP No. NC-25-1187
Related to: Bankr. Case No. 19-30088,
Adv. Proc. No. 25-03027 (DM)
[PROPOSED] ORDER
GRANTING APPELLANT’S
MOTION FOR
ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF
PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL
RULE 7-11 AND BANKRUPTCY
PROCEDURE 8017(A) FOR
LEAVE TO FILE A REPLY TO
APPELLEE’S RESPONSE TO
AMICUS BRIEF OF PG&E
FIRE VICTIMS
XXXXXXXX
(as modified)
Case 4:25-cv-09155-HSG Document 19 Filed 02/19/26 Page 1 of 2
Case No. 25-cv-09155-HSG
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Upon the motion (the “Administrative Motion”) dated February 16, 2026 filed by William
B. Abrams (“Appellant”) pursuant to Rule 7-11 of the Civil Local Rules for the United States
District Court for the Northern District of California (the “Local Rules”) and Rule 8017(a) of the
Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure (the “Bankruptcy Rules”) for leave to file his reply to the
Appellees’ Response to Amicus Brief [Dkt. 16] (the “Appellees’ Response”) filed concurrently with
the Administrative Motion. The Court having determined that the relief requested in the
Administrative Motion is in the best interests of PG&E, Appellant, Amici and all parties in interest;
and upon all of the proceedings had before this Court and after due deliberation and sufficient cause
appearing therefor,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1. The Administrative Motion is granted as provided herein
2. The Appellant is directed to e-file the Appellant Reply to the Appellees’ Response to
Amicus Brief, filed concurrently with the Administrative Motion as Exhibit C on the
docket forthwith as a stand-alone document
DATED: February ____, 2026
________________________
The Honorable Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.
United States District Judge
19
Case 4:25-cv-09155-HSG Document 19 Filed 02/19/26 Page 2 of 2

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.