HOLT v. HARTLINE et al

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
PENSACOLA DIVISION
JOSHUA HOLT,
Plaintiff,
vs. Case No.: 3:25cv567/LC/ZCB
J. HARTLINE, et al.,
Defendants.
_____________________/
ORDER
The magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation on November
18, 2025. (Doc. 17). The Court furnished the plaintiff a copy of the Report and
Recommendation and afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title
28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No objections have been filed.
Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined the
Report and Recommendation should be adopted.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED:
1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 17) is
adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.
2. Plaintiff’s Fourteenth Amendment due process claims are
DISMISSED under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) and 1915A(b)(1) for failure to
state a claim on which relief may be granted.
1
Case 3:25-cv-00567-TKW-ZCB Document 18 Filed 12/19/25 Page 1 of 2

3. Plaintiff’s § 1983 conspiracy claims are DISMISSED under 28
U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) and 1915A(b)(1) for failure to state a claim on which
relief may be granted.
4. This case is recommitted to the magistrate judge for further
proceedings on the First Amendment and Eighth Amendment claims asserted in
Plaintiff’s third amended complaint (Doc. 16).
DONE AND ORDERED this 19th day of December, 2025.
s/L.A. Collier
LACEY A. COLLIER
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Case 3:25-cv-00567-TKW-ZCB Document 18 Filed 12/19/25 Page 2 of 2