5:24-cv-00149•HAMP v. WILLIAMS
Testo completo
Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PANAMA CITY DIVISION BERNARD HAMP, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 5:24-cv-149-MCR-MJF CENTURION OF FLORIDA, et al., Defendants. / ORDER The Magistrate Judge has issued a Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 39, on Defendants’ motion to dismiss Plaintiff Bernard Hamp’s Second Amended Complaint brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, ECF No. 36. The Magistrate Judge recommends denying the motion on the Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference claim against Nurse Tiffany Williams, for her alleged delay in ordering x-rays, and granting the motion in all other respects due to the failure to state a claim. The parties were furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Defendant Williams objects. ECF No. 40. The Court has conducted a de novo review of the timely filed objections and concludes that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. The undersigned agrees with the Magistrate Judge that the Second Amended Complaint Case 5:24-cv-00149-MCR-MJF Document 41 Filed 02/19/26 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2 states a plausible claim against Williams for delaying the x-rays, given the allegations that Hamp had suffered five stab wounds in his back and was having difficulty breathing. This issue should be resolved on a fully developed record. Accordingly, it is ORDERED: 1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 39, is ADOPTED and incorporated by reference as the order of the Court, and the objection, ECF No. 40, is overruled. 2. Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Hamp’s Second Amended Complaint, ECF No. 36, is DENIED in part, as to the deliberate indifference claim against Defendant Williams, and GRANTED in part in all other respects. 3. The Clerk is directed to refer the case back to the assigned Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. DONE AND ORDERED this 19th day of February 2026. M. Casey Rodgers M. CASEY RODGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case 5:24-cv-00149-MCR-MJF Document 41 Filed 02/19/26 Page 2 of 2
Ti chiedi come si applica questo testo alla tua situazione?
Consulenza gratuita, senza impegno
Descrivi la tua situazione. Il nostro team ti ricontatterà via e-mail per la tua consulenza.
Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude
Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.