GUTMANN-CROWN v. GUTMANN

5:25-cv-00365Flnd15 giu 2026

Testo completo

Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
PANAMA CITY DIVISION
CLARICE MACHIA
GUTMANN-CROWN,
Plaintiff,
v. Case No. 5:25-cv-365-TKW-MJF
STEPHEN FRANCIS GUTMANN, et al.,
Defendants.
/
ORDER
This case is before the Court based on the magistrate judge’s Report and
Recommendation (Doc. 14). No objections were filed.
Upon due consideration of the Report and Recommendation and the case file,
the Court agrees with the magistrate judge’s determination that this case should be
dismissed because the second amended complaint is a shotgun pleading. It also
violates the local rules because it is not on court-mandated complaint form. See N.D.
Fla. Loc. R. 5.7(A).
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that:
1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and
incorporated by reference in this Order.
Case 5:25-cv-00365-TKW-MJF Document 15 Filed 06/15/26 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2
2. This case is DISMISSED because the second amended complaint is a
shotgun pleading and is not on the required complaint form.
3. The Clerk shall enter judgment in accordance with this Order and close
the case file.
DONE AND ORDERED this 15th day of June, 2026.
__________________________________
T. KENT WETHERELL, II
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 5:25-cv-00365-TKW-MJF Document 15 Filed 06/15/26 Page 2 of 2

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.