CROOK v. CUNNINGHAM

Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
PANAMA CITY DIVISION
TAMMY CROOK
a/k/a Ronny H. Crook,
Plaintiff,
v. Case No. 5:26-cv-57-TKW-MAF
M. CUNNINGHAM,
Defendant.
/
ORDER
This case is before the Court based on the magistrate judge’s Report and
Recommendation (Doc. 3). No objections were filed.
Upon due consideration of the Report and Recommendation and the case file,
the Court agrees with the magistrate judge’s determination that this case should be
dismissed under 28 U.S.C. §1915(g) because Plaintiff is a “three striker” and he did
not pay the filing fee. Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that:
1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and
incorporated by reference in this Order.
2. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice under the “three strikes
statute,” 28 U.S.C. §1915(g).
Case 5:26-cv-00057-TKW-MAF Document 6 Filed 03/27/26 Page 1 of 2

Page 2 of 2
3. The Clerk shall enter judgment in accordance with this Order and close
the case file.
DONE AND ORDERED this 27th day of March, 2026.
__________________________________
T. KENT WETHERELL, II
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 5:26-cv-00057-TKW-MAF Document 6 Filed 03/27/26 Page 2 of 2