USA v. Wilson

1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
CASE NO. 25-CR-60080-DAMIAN
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
vs.
LAURYN MARIE WILSON,
a/k/a Lauryn Lacy,
Defendant.
_____________________________/
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON CHANGE OF PLEA
THIS CAUSE is before the Court on an Order of Reference (ECF No. 34) from United
States District Judge Melissa Damian for the purpose of conducting a proceeding for acceptance
of a guilty plea by Defendant Lauryn Marie Wilson in the above-referenced case. 	On April 9,
2026, I conducted a Change of Plea hearing, attended by Defendant, her counsel Allari
Dominguez, and Assistant U.S. Attorney Camille Smith. 	I hereby REPORT and RECOMMEND
to the District Court as follows:
1. 	At the outset of the hearing, I advised Defendant of her right to have these
proceedings conducted by the District Judge assigned to the case. 	Further, I advised Defendant
that I was conducting the Change of Plea hearing on an Order of Reference from the District Judge.
I further advised Defendant that the District Judge assigned to this case would be the sentencing
judge and would make all findings and rulings concerning Defendant’s sentence.
2. 	I advised Defendant that she did not have to permit me, a United States Magistrate
Judge, to conduct this hearing and could request that the Change of Plea hearing be conducted only
AT
Apr 9, 2026
FTL
Case 0:25-cr-60080-MD Document 39 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/10/2026 Page 1 of 3

2
by a United States District Judge. 	Defendant and the Assistant United States Attorney assigned
to the case all agreed on the record and consented to me conducting the Change of Plea hearing.
3. 	I conducted a plea colloquy in accordance with the outline set forth in the Bench
Book for District Judges and Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.
4. 	The Parties have entered into a written Plea Agreement. 	ECF No. 37. 	I reviewed
the Plea Agreement on the record and had Defendant acknowledge that she signed and understood
the Plea Agreement. 	I also made certain that Defendant was aware of any applicable mandatory
minimum sentences (there are none) and statutory enhancements (there are none). 	I advised
Defendant of the maximum sentence that could be imposed in this case pursuant to the Plea
Agreement and the applicable statutes. 	Defendant acknowledged that she understood the
possible maximum penalties (including fines, supervised release, restitution, forfeiture, and special
assessments) that could be imposed in this case.
5. 	Defendant pleaded guilty to count 1 of the Indictment, which charges her with
importation of a controlled substance, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 952(a) and 960(b)(3).
6. 	The Parties provided a signed, agreed written factual basis for the entry of the plea
(ECF No. 36), which includes all the essential elements of the crime to which Defendant is
pleading guilty and any statutory sentencing enhancements and/or aggravating factors that may be
applicable (there are none). 	Defendant acknowledged on the record that she read and understood
the written factual proffer, had signed that proffer, agreed that the facts set forth in the proffer were
true and accurate, and agreed that the proffer included the essential elements of the offense to
which she is pleading guilty.
7. 	I 	advised 	Defendant 	about 	the 	possible 	immigration 	and 	other 	collateral
consequences of her guilty plea.
Case 0:25-cr-60080-MD Document 39 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/10/2026 Page 2 of 3

3
8. 	Defendant expressed satisfaction with her counsel’s representation.
9. 	Defendant has been referred to the U.S. Probation Office for the preparation of a
pre-sentence investigation report.
Based on all the foregoing and the plea colloquy, I RECOMMEND that Defendant,
Lauryn Marie Wilson, (1) be found to have freely and voluntarily entered her guilty plea to
importation of a controlled substance, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 952(a) and 960(b)(3), (2) that
her plea of guilty be accepted, and (3) that she be adjudged guilty of this offense. 	I further
recommend that a sentencing hearing be conducted for final disposition of this matter.
The parties will have three (3) days from the date of being served with a copy of this Report
and Recommendation within which to file written objections, if any, with the Honorable Melissa
Damian, United States District Judge. 	If neither party has an objection to this Report and
Recommendation, the parties shall file a joint notice of non-objection within three (3) days from
the date of being served with a copy of this Report and Recommendation. 	Failure to file
objections timely shall bar the parties from a de novo determination by the District Judge of any
issue covered in the Report and shall bar the parties from attacking on appeal unobjected-to factual
and legal conclusions contained therein, except upon grounds of plain error if necessary in the
interest of justice. 	See 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985); Henley v.
Johnson, 885 F.2d 790, 794 (1989); 11th Cir. R. 3-1 (2016).
DONE AND SUBMITTED at Fort Lauderdale, Florida, this 9th day of April, 2026.
Case 0:25-cr-60080-MD Document 39 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/10/2026 Page 3 of 3