Robertson v. Payopic LLC et al

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
CASE NO. 0:25-cv-61280-LEIBOWITZ/AUGUSTIN-BIRCH
COLE ROBERTSON,
Plaintiff,
v.
PAYOPIC, LLC,
et al.,
Defendants.
________________________/
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation on Plaintiff’s
Verified Motion for Attorney’s Fees and Costs [ECF No. 54] (the “R&R”), filed on June 2, 2026,
recommending that Plaintiff’s Motion [ECF Nos. 50, 53] (“the Motion”) be GRANTED IN PART
and DENIED IN PART. [ECF No. 54 at 1, 6]. The undersigned previously referred the Motion to
U.S. Magistrate Judge Augustin-Birch for a report and recommendation, consistent with 28 U.S.C.
§ 636(b)(1)(B), Rule 72 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and Rule 1(d) of the Local Magistrate
Judge Rules. [ECF No. 51]. No objections to the R&R were filed during the 14-day objection period.
Thus, having reviewed the Motion, the record, the Report and Recommendation, the governing law
and finding no error, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that:
1. 	The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 54] is AFFIRMED
and ADOPTED and fully incorporated herein.
2. 	Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorney’s Fees and Costs [ECF No. 50 and ECF No. 53] is
GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.
3. 	The Court awards Plaintiff $7,650.00 in attorney’s fees and $626.35 in taxable costs
against Defendants, jointly and severally.
Case 0:25-cv-61280-DSL Document 55 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/22/2026 Page 1 of 2

DONE AND ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on June 18, 2026.
cc: 	counsel of record
Case 0:25-cv-61280-DSL Document 55 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/22/2026 Page 2 of 2