FITZGERALD v. BAUGHER et al

1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
MACON DIVISION
CLAIRE FITZGERALD, 	:
:
Plaintiff, 	:
:
v. 	: 	Case No.: 5:26-cv-328-CAR
:
JAMES R. BAUGHER, ERIC 	:
KOMITEE, MICHAEL LOGUERCIO, 	:
and MARGO K. BRODIE, 	:
:
Defendants. 	:
:
ORDER DISMISSING CASE
On August 12, 2026, the Court granted pro se Plaintiff Claire Fitzgerald’s Motion
to Proceed in forma pauperis and warned her that this case would be dismissed if she failed
to file a recast complaint within 21 days of the Court’s Order.1 Plaintiff has failed to
comply with the Court’s Order, and the time to do so has now expired.2 Therefore, the
Court hereby DISMISSES this case without prejudice.
SO ORDERED, this 14th day of October, 2026.
s/ C. Ashley Royal________________
C. ASHLEY ROYAL, SENIOR JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
1 Doc. 3.
2 Id. On August 13, 2026, the Clerk’s office mailed a copy of the Order to the address Plaintiff provided, but
on August 24, 2026, the mail was returned as undeliverable reflecting there was no such street. See Doc. 4.
A party has a duty to keep the Court informed of his or her address. See Lewis v. Conners Steel Co., 673 F.2d
1240, 1243 (11th Cir. 1982); see also Weston v. St. Petersburg Police Dep't, No. 8:09-CV-495-T-27TBM, 2010 WL
3154096, at *1 (M.D. Fla. Aug. 9, 2010) (collecting cases).
Case 5:26-cv-00328-CAR Document 5 Filed 10/14/26 Page 1 of 1