Livingston v. DVA Renal Healthcare, Inc.

3:25-cv-01869Ilsd19 dic 2025

Testo completo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
KARA LIVINGSTON,
Plaintiff,
v.
DVA RENAL HEALTHCARE, INC.
d/b/a DAVITA,
Defendant.
Case No. 25-cv-01869-JPG
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This case is before the Court on Defendant DVA Renal Healthcare d/b/a Davita’s Motion
to Strike (Doc. 18). Defendant asks the Court to strike Plaintiff Kara Livingston’s claims for
compensatory damages for mental anguish, distress, humiliation, loss of enjoyment of life, and
for punitive damages. Plaintiff did not respond within fourteen (14) days after the motion was
served as allowed by SDIL-LR 7.1(b)(2). Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(f) provides that,
“[o]n motion made by a party . . . before responding to the pleading,” the Court “may strike from
a pleading an insufficient defense or any redundant, immaterial, impertinent, or scandalous
matter.” Generally, motions to strike are not favored. Khalid Bin Talal Bin Abdul Azaiz Al Seoud
v. E. F. Hutton & Co., 720 F. Supp. 671, 686 (N.D. Ill. 1989). The Court will not strike a matter
from a pleading unless it is clear that it can have no possible bearing on the subject matter of the
litigation. Capitol Indem. Corp. v. Tranel Devs., Inc., 144 F.R.D. 346, 347 (N.D. Ill. 1992).
Moreover, pleadings will not be stricken unless the moving party is prejudiced. Id. Prejudice
results when the matter complained of has the effect of confusing the issues or where it is so
lengthy and complex that it places an undue burden on the responding party. Anderson v. Bd. of
Educ. of City of Chicago, 169 F. Supp. 2d 864, 868 (N.D. Ill. 2001).
Case 3:25-cv-01869-JPG Document 23 Filed 12/19/25 Page 1 of 2 Page ID
#<pageID>
2
Defendant argues that Plaintiff’s claims for damages for emotional distress and punitive
damages are “immaterial and impertinent” because such damages are not available under the
FMLA. The Court agrees that the FMLA does not authorize awards of punitive damages or
damages for emotional distress. See Heinze v. S. Illinois Healthcare, No. CIV. 08-672-GPM,
2010 WL 276722, at *2 (S.D. Ill. Jan. 19, 2010). Since these damages are legally impermissible
under the FMLA, Plaintiff’s claims for such damages have no bearing on this litigation. Further,
Defendant has shown that it will be prejudiced if the Court does not strike the claims. Allowing
Plaintiff to pursue these damages would require Defendant to defend against damages not
contemplated by the FMLA. This will increase litigation costs unnecessarily by expanding the
scope of the trial and has the potential to confuse the issues and mislead the jury. Accordingly,
the Court GRANTS Defendant DVA Renal Healthcare d/b/a Davita’s Motion to Strike (Doc.
18). Plaintiff’s claims for compensatory damages for mental anguish, distress, humiliation, and
loss of enjoyment of life, and for punitive damages are STRICKEN.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: 	December 19, 2025
s/ J. Phil Gilbert
J. PHIL GILBERT
United States District Judge
Case 3:25-cv-01869-JPG Document 23 Filed 12/19/25 Page 2 of 2 Page ID
#<pageID>

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.