3:25-cv-00605•Alphonso v. Department of Public Safety and Corrections State of Louisiana
Alphonso v. Department of Public Safety and Corrections State of Louisiana
3:25-cv-00605Lamd10 feb 2026
Testo completo
UNITED STATES DISTEICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA GLENN ALPHONSO CIVIL ACTION VERSUS STATE OF LOUISIANA, THROUGH THE LOUSIANA DEPARTMENT OF SAFE NO. 25-00605-BAJ-EWD AND CORRECTIONS, ET AL. RULING AND ORDER On January 21, 2026, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report And Recommendation (Doc. 22, the "R&R") recommending that the above-captioned action be remanded to the Tsventieth Judicial District Court for the Parish of East Feliciana, State of Louisiana, because removal to this Court was procedurally defective as Defendants did not unanimously consent to removal. The Report also recommends that Plaintiff be awarded just costs and actual expenses, including attorney's fees, if Plaintiff provided "a supplemental memorandum and supporting evidence to quantify the amounts sought, including attorney s fees, incurred as a result of the removal" by no later than February 4, 2026. The record shows that no objections to the R&R were filed and that Plaintiff did not submit a supplemental memorandum regarding attorney's fees. Having carefully considered Defendant's Notice of Removal (Doc. 1), Plaintiffs Motion to Remand (Doc. 6), Defendant's Opposition (Doc. 12), and Plaintiffs Reply Brief (Doc. 21), the Court APPROVES the Magistrate Judge's Report And Recommendation and ADOPTS it as the Court's opinion in this matter. Case 3:25-cv-00605-BAJ-EWD Document 23 02/10/26 Page 1 of 2
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion to Remand (Doc. 6) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the above-captioned action be and is hereby immediately REMANDED to the Twentieth Judicial District Court for the Parish of East Feliciana, State of Louisiana. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion for Entry of Preliminary Default and for Hearing on Conformation of Default (Doc. 7) and Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 11) are DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs request for attorney's fees and costs is DENIED. i6^Baton Rouge, Louisiana, this ___5ay of February, 2026 (^JUDGE BRIAN A^dACKSON UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA Case 3:25-cv-00605-BAJ-EWD Document 23 02/10/26 Page 2 of 2
Ti chiedi come si applica questo testo alla tua situazione?
Consulenza gratuita, senza impegno
Descrivi la tua situazione. Il nostro team ti ricontatterà via e-mail per la tua consulenza.
Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude
Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.