DIAMOND v. ODEDERE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
MARTIN RUSSELL DIAMOND, )
)
Plaintiff, )
)
v. ) 1:22-cv-287
)
ODEDERE, Unit Manager, )
)
Defendant. )
ORDER
This matter is before the court for review of the Text
Recommendation (“Recommendation”) filed on April 13, 2026, by
the Magistrate Judge in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). (See
Doc. Ent. 4/13/2026.) In the Recommendation, the Magistrate
Judge recommends that the court deny Plaintiff’s Letter Motion,
(Doc. 136), as moot. The Recommendation was served on Plaintiff
April 14, 2026. (Doc. 137.) Plaintiff filed timely objections,
(Doc. 138), to the Recommendation.
This court is required to “make a de novo determination of
those portions of the [Magistrate Judge’s] report or specified
proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is
made.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). This court “may accept, reject, or
modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations
made by the [M]agistrate [J]udge. . .[,] or recommit the matter
to the [M]agistrate [J]udge with instructions.” Id.
Case 1:22-cv-00287-WO-LPA Document 139 Filed 06/15/26 Page 1 of 2

- 2 -
This court has considered Plaintiff’s arguments in his
objections and has made a de novo determination which is in
accord with the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation. This court
therefore adopts the Recommendation.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Text
Recommendation, (Doc. Ent. 4/13/2026), is ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER
ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Letter Motion, (Doc. 136), is DENIED as
MOOT.
This the 15th day of June, 2026.
__________________________________
United States District Judge
Case 1:22-cv-00287-WO-LPA Document 139 Filed 06/15/26 Page 2 of 2