MUHAMMAD v. SPIVEY et al

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
BAARI'A [of the family] MUHAMMAD, 	)
)
Plaintiff, 	)
)
v. 	) 	1:25cv972
)
REX ALAN SPIVEY et al., 	)
)
Defendants. 	)
ORDER
On 	February 	24, 	2026, 	the 	Text 	Recommendation 	of 	the 	United
States 	Magistrate 	Judge 	was 	entered 	and 	notice 	was 	served 	on 	the
parties in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). 	Plaintiff objected
to the Recommendation. 	(Doc. 63.)
The 	court 	has 	carefully 	reviewed 	the 	portions 	of 	the
Magistrate Judge’s report to which objection was made and has made
a 	de 	novo 	determination 	in 	accord 	with 	the 	Magistrate 	Judge’s
report. 	The 	court 	finds 	that 	the 	objections 	do 	not 	change 	the
substance of the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation, and the court
therefore adopts the Recommendation.
IT 	IS 	THEREFORE 	ORDERED 	that 	the 	court 	DENIES 	the 	Motion 	to
Vacate 	Judgment 	(Doc. 	55). 	The 	motion 	is 	yet 	another 	frivolous
waste of this court's limited resources.
Case 1:25-cv-00972-TDS-LPA Document 65 Filed 04/02/26 Page 1 of 2

2
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion for Leave to File Brief
(Doc. 	61) 	and 	Motion 	to 	Waive 	Pacer 	Fees 	(Doc. 	64) 	are 	DENIED 	as
MOOT.
/s/ 	Thomas D. Schroeder
United States District Judge
April 2, 2026
Case 1:25-cv-00972-TDS-LPA Document 65 Filed 04/02/26 Page 2 of 2