North Dakota Farm Bureau, Inc. et al v. Attorney General of North Dakota

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA
North Dakota Farm Bureau, Inc., et. al, )
)
Plaintiffs, ) ORDER
)
vs. )
) Case No. 1-16-cv-137
Wayne Stenehjem, in his Official Capacity )
as Attorney General of North Dakota, )
)
)
Defendant. )
Before the court is Plaintiffs’ Motion to Stay Rule 26(F) Planning Meeting and 16(B)
Scheduling Conference. (Docket No. 45). In the motion, the Plaintiffs move the court to stay the
scheduling conference currently ordered for November 10, 2016, (Docket No. 29), because multiple
parties have sought to intervene in this suit since the court entered that order. (Docket Nos. 30, 35).
The court agrees a stay is appropriate until Judge Hovland has ruled on these motions. The court
GRANTS Plaintiffs’ Motion to Stay Rule 26(F) Planning Meeting and 16(B) Scheduling
Conference. (Docket No. 45). The court will reschedule the Rule 26(F) Planning Meeting and 16(B)
Scheduling Conference after Judge Hovland rules on the motions to intervene. The scheduling
conference currently ordered for November 10, 2016 is cancelled.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated this 24th day of October, 2016.
/s/ Charles S. Miller, Jr.
Charles S. Miller, Jr., Magistrate Judge
United States District Court
Case 1:16-cv-00137-DLH-CSM Document 47 Filed 10/24/16 Page 1 of 1