USA v. Cabrera et al

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
vs.
RAMIRO TREJO,
Defendant.
8:25CR222
ORDER
This matter is before the Court on Defendant's Unopposed Motion to Extend Pretrial
Motion Deadline. (Filing No. 49). The motion is unopposed by the government. For good cause
shown, the Court finds the motion should be granted. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED:
1) Defendant's Unopposed Motion to Extend Pretrial Motion Deadline, (Filing No.
49), is granted.
2) Pretrial motions shall be filed by February 17, 2026.
3) In accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), the Court finds that the ends of
justice will be served by granting this motion and outweigh the interests of the
public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Any additional time arising as a result
of the granting of this motion, that is, the time between today’s date and February
17, 2026, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the
requirement of the Speedy Trial Act. Failure to grant this motion would deny
counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account
the exercise of due diligence, and the novelty and complexity of the case. The
failure to grant this motion might result in a miscarriage of justice. 18 U.S.C. §
3161(h)(7)(A) & (B). Failing to timely object to this order as provided under this
court’s local rules will be deemed a waiver of any right to later claim the time
should not have been excluded under the Speedy Trial Act.
Dated this 14th day of January, 2026.
BY THE COURT:
s/Michael D. Nelson
United States Magistrate Judge
8:25-cr-00222-RFR-MDN Doc # 50 Filed: 01/14/26 Page 1 of 1 - Page ID #
<pageID>