Mitchell v. Hill et al

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Robin Mitchell
v.
Janet Hill, et al
Case No. 21-cv-1068-LM
ORDER
No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Report and
Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone dated April 25,
2022 (Doc. No. 5). For the reasons explained therein, the plaintiff’s
Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 4) is dismissed for failure to state a
claim upon which relief can be granted. Additionally, the Court
declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the state law
claims and therefore dismisses those claims without prejudice.
The clerk is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this
Order and close the case.
“‘[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections to the
magistrate's report are subject to review in the district court and
those not preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.’”
School Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st
Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs., 848
F.2d 271, 275 (1st Cir.1988)); see also United States v. Valencia-
Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice, failure to
file a specific objection to magistrate's report will waive the right
Case 1:21-cv-01068-LM Document 6 Filed 05/12/22 Page 1 of 2

to appeal).
____________________________
Landya B. McCafferty
Chief Judge
Date: May 12, 2022
cc: Robin Mitchell, pro se
Case 1:21-cv-01068-LM Document 6 Filed 05/12/22 Page 2 of 2