Amatucci v. Wolfeboro, NH, Town of

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Josephine Amatucci
v. 	Case No. 25-cv-549-SM-AJ
Opinion No. 2026 DNH 051
Town of Wolfeboro, N.H.
O R D E R
Josephine Amatucci, who is representing herself and
proceeding pro se, filed another suit against the Town of
Wolfeboro, again contesting the circumstances and aftermath of a
traffic violation that occurred in August of 2013. 	See Amatucci
v. Town of Wolfeboro, 13-cv-501-PB; Amatucci v. Welman, 14-cv-
164-PB (D.N.H. judgment entered July 1, 2014). On preliminary
review, the magistrate judge recommended that the complaint be
dismissed as untimely and also noted that the claims are barred
by the doctrine of res judicata. 	Doc. no. 4. 	Amatucci filed
“Motion for Jury Trial,” which the court considered as her
response to the report and recommendation.1 	Doc. no. 5.
The district judge reviews a report and recommendation only
to the extent the affected party objects. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1);
Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3). 	For the reasons stated in the report
and recommendation (doc. no. 4), Amatucci’s claims in this case
1 Amatucci filed 53 pages of exhibits to her motion, which
pertain to her many cases filed in this court arising from
events in 2002 and 2003.
Case 1:25-cv-00549-SM-AJ Document 7 Filed 05/05/26 Page 1 of 2

2
are barred by the statute of limitations. 	Nothing in Amatucci’s
motion for a jury trial and her exhibits to the motion change
the outcome. 	The claims are dismissed as time barred.
Conclusion
The report and recommendation to dismiss the claims in this
case as time barred (doc. no. 4) is approved and adopted. 	The
complaint is dismissed.
The clerk of court shall enter judgment accordingly and
close the case.
SO ORDERED.
____________________________
Steven J. McAuliffe
United States District Judge
May 5, 2026
cc: 	Josephine Amatucci, pro se
Counsel of Record
Case 1:25-cv-00549-SM-AJ Document 7 Filed 05/05/26 Page 2 of 2