Clark v. Rosenthal et al

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Lucy Clark
v.
Rosenthal et al.
Case No. 26-cv-332-LM-TSM
ORDER
No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Report and
Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Talesha L. Saint-Marc dated May 4,
2026 . 	“[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections to the
magistrate's report are subject to review in the district court and
those not preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.”
Rivera-Aponte v. Gomez Bus Line, Inc., 62 F.4th 1, 10 (1st Cir. 2023)
(quoting Sch. Union No. 37 v. United Nat’l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564
(1st Cir. 2010)); see also Santos-Santos v. Torres-Centeno, 842 F.3d
163, 168 (1st Cir. 2016) (“[P]arties who fail to file objections to a
magistrate judge’s report and recommendation lose their right to
appellate review.”).
The complaint is dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk is directed
to enter judgment and close the case.
____________________________
Landya B. McCafferty
United States District Judge
Date: June 18, 2026
cc: Lucy Clark, pro se
Case 1:26-cv-00332-LM-TSM Document 4 Filed 06/18/26 Page 1 of 1