AIRN LIQUIDATION TRUST CO., LLC v. Valley National Bancorp

2:25-ap-01237Njb18 feb 2026

Testo completo

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
In Re:
NATIONAL REALTY INVESTMENT
ADVISORS, LLC,
Debtor.
Case No.: 	22-14539
Chapter: 	11
Judge: 	John K. Sherwood
AIRN LIQUIDATION TRUST CO., LLC
in its capacity as Liquidation Trustee of the
AIRN LIQUIDATION TRUST,
Plaintiff,
v.
VALLEY NATIONAL BANCORP, D/B/A
VALLEY NATIONAL BANK,
Defendant.
Adv. Pro. No.: 25-01237
DECISION
The relief set forth on the following pages numbered two (2) through fourteen (14) is
hereby 	ORDERED.
DATED: February 18, 2026
Order Filed on February 18, 2026
by Clerk
U.S. Bankruptcy Court
District of New Jersey
Case 25-01237-JKS Doc 17 Filed 02/18/26 Entered 02/18/26 11:04:19 Desc Main
Document Page 1 of 14
Page 2
Debtor: 	National Realty Investment Advisors, LLC
Case No.: 	22-14539
Adv. Pro.: 	25-01237
Caption:
INTRODUCTION
The d 	Valley
Motion to Dismiss [ECF No. 8] the plaintiff AIRN Liquidation Trust Co., 	Plaintiff
Complaint. The Plaintiff seeks a judgment against Valley based on its alleged role in a real estate
Ponzi scheme carried out through the debtors, National Realty Investment Advisors, LLC, and its
affiliates 	NRIA 	1 	[ECF No. 1]. Valley performed banking services for NRIA from July 2021
to December 2021, during which time NRIA opened eleven (11) business accounts. [ECF No. 1,
¶¶ 2, 56].
aiding and abetting claims should be dismissed for failing to adequately allege that Valley had
actual knowledge of the Ponzi scheme or substantially assisted the Ponzi scheme. It also argues
ificant claims should be dismissed on other grounds. [ECF
No. 8-2, p. 9 of 37]. The Court has recently decided a similar motion to dismiss by a bank that was
sued by the Plaintiff based on its dealings with NRIA and its principals. 	AIRN Liquidation Trust
Co., LLC v. Bank of America, N.A., Case No. 22-14539, Adv. Pro. No. 25-01239 (Dec. 31, 2025),
BofA Decision 	BofA Case 	). The Court will incorporate much of the legal
analysis in that decision.
JURISDICTION
This Court has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1334(b), 157(a), and
the Standing Order of Reference from the United States District Court for the District of New
1 	Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein have the same definitions as set forth in the Complaint.
Case 25-01237-JKS Doc 17 Filed 02/18/26 Entered 02/18/26 11:04:19 Desc Main
Document Page 2 of 14
Page 3
Debtor: 	National Realty Investment Advisors, LLC
Case No.: 	22-14539
Adv. Pro.: 	25-01237
Caption:
Jersey. The Plaintiff alleges that this is a core proceeding citing to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2). Valley
argues that this is a non-core proceeding and does not consent to the entry of final orders or
judgment by the Bankruptcy Court. Fed. R. Bankr. P. 7008. To the extent this proceeding (or any
part thereof) is ultimately determined to be non-
proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law under 28 U.S.C. § 157(c)(1).
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
The Complaint alleges that Thomas Nicholas Salzano a/k/a Nick Salzano, Rey E. Grabato
II, and other co-conspirators operated NRIA, a purported real estate development firm and fund
manager, as a Ponzi scheme that lured Investors by promising high rates of returns. Throughout
the course of the scheme, NRIA raised approximately $664 million from almost 2,000 Investors.
[ECF No. 1, ¶ 1]. In March 2021, Salzano was arrested for giving an Investor a forged term sheet.
Casey Group
[ECF No. 1, ¶¶ 5, 52]. The Casey Group was appointed as manager effective November 1, 2021,
and was responsible for ensuring NRIA used the 	-14539,
ECF No. 16, p. 5 of 22].
NRIA filed for Chapter 11 relief on June 7, 2022. The Court confirmed its Amended
Chapter 11 Plan on August 10, 2023, which provided for the formation of the Liquidating Trust as
litigation claims belonging to the Trust
22-14539, ECF No. 3599].
In 2002, Grabato opened personal bank accounts at Valley. [ECF No. 1, ¶ 23].
relationship with Valley did not begin until July 2021, which was f
Case 25-01237-JKS Doc 17 Filed 02/18/26 Entered 02/18/26 11:04:19 Desc Main
Document Page 3 of 14
Page 4
Debtor: 	National Realty Investment Advisors, LLC
Case No.: 	22-14539
Adv. Pro.: 	25-01237
Caption:
arrest. [ECF No. 1, ¶¶ 5-6, 28]. NRIA opened its Valley accounts after other banks terminated
NRIA as a customer. Between July 2021 and December 2021, approximately $40 million of new,
into Valley accounts. In total, approximately $265 million flowed through eleven (11) Valley
accounts during this five-month-long banking relationship. [ECF No. 1, ¶¶ 28-32]. For the last two
of the five months, NRIA was managed by the Casey Group. The Plaintiff does not suggest that
The allegations in this Complaint are very similar to the allegations in the
Complaint in the BofA Case.2 	The Complaint against Valley contains twelve (12) counts
summarized below.
2 	The only difference is that a preference claim has not been brought against Valley.
Case 25-01237-JKS Doc 17 Filed 02/18/26 Entered 02/18/26 11:04:19 Desc Main
Document Page 4 of 14
Page 5
Debtor: 	National Realty Investment Advisors, LLC
Case No.: 	22-14539
Adv. Pro.: 	25-01237
Caption:
[ECF No. 1].
In its Motion to Dismiss, Valley makes the same primary arguments as the bank in the
BofA Case: (i) the Plaintiff lacks standing and (ii) the Plaintiff fails to sufficiently plead the aiding
and abetting claims. [ECF No. 8-2].
Case 25-01237-JKS Doc 17 Filed 02/18/26 Entered 02/18/26 11:04:19 Desc Main
Document Page 5 of 14
Page 6
Debtor: 	National Realty Investment Advisors, LLC
Case No.: 	22-14539
Adv. Pro.: 	25-01237
Caption:
ANALYSIS
Valley argues that the Plaintiff does not have standing to pursue tort claims against it. The
Court found that the Plaintiff has standing in the BofA Decision, and it has standing here for the
same reasons. First, the Plaintiff has standing to pursue tort claims on behalf of NRIA because the
Plaintiff was established to pursue or liquidate the Liquidation Trust Assets and make distributions
to Liquidation Trust Beneficiaries pursuant to the terms of the Liquidation Trust Agreement.3
[BofA Decision, p. 8]. Second, 	anti-assignment law is preempted by § 1123 of the
Bankruptcy Code
Trust was an appropriate means of plan implementation under § 1123(a)(5). [BofA Decision, pp.
9-11]. Third, the terms of the confirmed Plan per the Confirmation Order preempt state law and
there are no compelling reasons to reconsider that decision. [BofA Decision, pp. 11-13]. Therefore,
the Plaintiff has standing to bring tort claims against Valley on behalf of NRIA and the Investors.
To establish aiding and abetting fraud in New Jersey, the Plaintiff must prove that (1) NRIA
committed fraud which caused an injury at the time of the d 	defendant
assistance; and (3) the defendant knowingly and substantially assisted in the fraud. This Court
discussed the requirements of pleading aiding and abetting fraud in the BofA Decision. [BofA
Decision, pp. 13-18].
3 	Also, as found in the BofA Decision 	in pari delicto 	defense is premature.
Case 25-01237-JKS Doc 17 Filed 02/18/26 Entered 02/18/26 11:04:19 Desc Main
Document Page 6 of 14
Page 7
Debtor: 	National Realty Investment Advisors, LLC
Case No.: 	22-14539
Adv. Pro.: 	25-01237
Caption:
The Complaint easily satisfies the first element of the aiding and abetting analysis because
with detailed facts. [ECF No. 1, ¶¶ 33-72]. As to the
knowledge requirement, the Plaintiff 	allegations include:
Allegations that Valley did not follow proper procedures, conduct due diligence, and investigate
red flags might support a claim that Valley should have been aware of the fraud occurring at NRIA.
However, standing alone, they are insufficient to support the allegation that Valley had actual
knowledge of the alleged fraud.
But, the Complaint also alleges that suspicious activities took place in
Valley account 	which suggests that Valley may have had some
In January 2020, before NRIA began banking with Valley, Valley
of funds being deposited in his personal accounts. While Grabato was making over $380,000 in
Case 25-01237-JKS Doc 17 Filed 02/18/26 Entered 02/18/26 11:04:19 Desc Main
Document Page 7 of 14
Page 8
Debtor: 	National Realty Investment Advisors, LLC
Case No.: 	22-14539
Adv. Pro.: 	25-01237
Caption:
deposits, he only substantiated $220,000 as his annual salary at NRIA. [ECF No. 1, ¶ 88-91]. This
account and that 	Also,
the Complaint alleges instances of suspicious deposits in the NRIA accounts at Valley. NRIA
principals 	advised 	Valley 	that 	its 	accounts 	ending 	in 	x7560 	and 	x7579 	would 	receive
approximately $200,000 in deposits each month, but in their first months, x7560 received $24
million and x7579 received $4.5 million. [ECF No. 1, ¶¶ 117-18].
Moreover
and the NRIA accounts at Valley. The Complaint alleges that Grabato used funds transferred by
NRIA
30, 2021, which was after Salzano was arrested. Then, on July 1, 2021, Grabato wrote a check for
-
name. [ECF No. 1, ¶ 126].
Other 	compelling 	allegations 	concern 	events 	in 	October 	2021 	when 	the 	Vice
closing all NRIA accounts. This allows the Court to infer that Valley was scrutinizing the account
activity and found something wrong. Even so, Valley allowed the accounts to remain open into
Valley allowed $24.3 million of Investor funds
to flow through the bank. [ECF No. 1, ¶¶ 155-63].
Case 25-01237-JKS Doc 17 Filed 02/18/26 Entered 02/18/26 11:04:19 Desc Main
Document Page 8 of 14
Page 9
Debtor: 	National Realty Investment Advisors, LLC
Case No.: 	22-14539
Adv. Pro.: 	25-01237
Caption:
More
accounts at Valley, including consequential activity that occurred 	after 	Valley noticed the accounts
for closure on October 28, 2021, but kept them open. Lines 97 through 108 of Exhibit A to the
Complaint show a slew of extraordinary transactions totaling several hundreds of thousands of
dollars from NRIA to Grabato and from Grabato to insiders and family members. [ECF No. 1-1,
p. 3 of 4].
personal Valley account ending in x7667 between October 4, 2021 and December 3, 2021. [ECF
No. 1, ¶ 124]. As stated above, Grabato had previously reported to Valley that his NRIA salary
was $220,000, which is substantially less than the transfer. [ECF No. 1, ¶ 124]. Also, Grabato
-wife Jamie
Samul from August 2021 to November 2021 totaling $60,000. The transfer from the fourth check
was made on November 2, 2021. [ECF No. 1-1, p. 3 of 4]. On October 18, 2021, $600,000 was
moved from
in x7667. [ECF No. 1-1, p. 3 of 4, Transfer #93].
had a balance of $41,000. [ECF No. 1, ¶ 128]. Grabato then wrote four checks to himself totaling
$350,000 on November 1 and November 2, 2021. [ECF No. 1-1, p. 3 of 4]. Then, on November 9,
2021, Grabato wrote a check for $20,000 to his ex-wife Georginette Cleofe. [ECF No. 1-1, p. 3 of
4].
insiders. [ECF No. 1, ¶¶ 123-29].
The above allegations by the Plaintiff support a reasonable inference that Valley may have
The Plaintiff will have to prove that Valley learned that NRIA
was engaged in fraudulent activities and decided to overlook them because of the benefits derived
Case 25-01237-JKS Doc 17 Filed 02/18/26 Entered 02/18/26 11:04:19 Desc Main
Document Page 9 of 14
Page 10
Debtor: 	National Realty Investment Advisors, LLC
Case No.: 	22-14539
Adv. Pro.: 	25-01237
Caption:
e
opportunity to do so.
Next, the Court must consider whether the pleadings provide enough information for the
Court to infer substantial assistance of the fraud. [BofA Decision, pp. 17-18]. The Plaintiff alleged
that Valley substantially assisted in the fraud committed by NRIA as follows:
-
2, p. 26 of 37]. However, Valley arguably engaged in services that were beyond standard when it
granted the account exceptions described above and kept NRIA accounts open after flagging them
for closure. [BofA Decision, pp. 17-18]. For these reasons, the Plaintiff adequately pled that Valley
A claim for aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty is similar to a claim of aiding and
abetting fraud but also requires 	conduct constituted a breach
of fiduciary duty and gave substantial assistance or encouragement to the other in committing that
Case 25-01237-JKS Doc 17 Filed 02/18/26 Entered 02/18/26 11:04:19 Desc Main
Document Page 10 of 14
Page 11
Debtor: 	National Realty Investment Advisors, LLC
Case No.: 	22-14539
Adv. Pro.: 	25-01237
Caption:
Bd. Of Trs. of Teamsters Local 863 Pension Fund v. Foodtown, Inc., 296 F.3d 164, 174
(3d Cir. 2002) (citations omitted).
As in the BofA Decision, the first prong of aiding and abetting is satisfied because the
-07].
The question is whether the Plaintiff sufficiently pled that Valley had knowledge that NRIA was
breaching its fiduciary duty to Investors. As set forth in the previous section, the Plaintiff alleges
that there were instances during
special scrutiny. Additionally, the Pla
breach of fiduciary duty through the daily Positive Pay System Notifications, review of accounts
that were flagged for closure, and
demonstrating extraordinary transfers both before and after the NRIA account was flagged for
closure. [ECF No. 1, ¶¶ 123-29, 138-41]. With this information, it is reasonable to infer that Valley
learned that NRIA was moving funds between accounts at the bank in violation of its duties to
Investors.
described above, also demonstrate
duty. Therefore, the Plaintiff sufficiently pled aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty. Count
Three will not be dismissed.
Case 25-01237-JKS Doc 17 Filed 02/18/26 Entered 02/18/26 11:04:19 Desc Main
Document Page 11 of 14
Page 12
Debtor: 	National Realty Investment Advisors, LLC
Case No.: 	22-14539
Adv. Pro.: 	25-01237
Caption:
Like in the BofA Case and other related NRIA adversary proceedings, the Complaint did
not make any allegations that Valley represented NRIA directly in the sale of securities.4 	The
Plaintiff did not adequately plead that Valley aided and abetted securities fraud and Count Two of
the Complaint will be dismissed.
The Complaint seeks recovery of actual fraudulent transfers to Valley under § 548(a)(1)(A)
of the Bankruptcy Code (Count Four) and under New Jersey law (Count Six). Here, the Plaintiff
alleges that the fraudulent transfers from NRIA to Valley include banking and management fees
in the two years preceding the bankruptcy in the amount of approximately $5,000. [ECF No. 1, ¶¶
216-17]. The Plaintiff states that these transfers of fees to Valley were made in furtherance of the
Ponzi scheme. [ECF No. 1, ¶ 220]. As set forth in the BofA Decision, the Ponzi scheme
presumption applies because the Plaintiff alleges that NRIA was conducting a Ponzi scheme and
that the fees paid to Valley were in furtherance of the Ponzi scheme. The actual fraudulent transfer
claims in Counts Four and Six will not be dismissed.
The Plaintiff also brings claims for constructive fraudulent transfers under the Bankruptcy
Code (Count Five) and New Jersey law (Count Seven). Section 548(a)(1)(B) of the Bankruptcy
Code provides that transfers may be avoided if the Debtors received less than reasonably
4 	The other related adversary cases are 	AIRN Liquidation Trust Co., LLC v. Media Effective, LLC, (Adv.
Pro. No. 23-01335) and 	AIRN Liquidation Trust Co., LLC v. Wipfli LLP, (Adv. Pro. No. 24-01456).
Case 25-01237-JKS Doc 17 Filed 02/18/26 Entered 02/18/26 11:04:19 Desc Main
Document Page 12 of 14
Page 13
Debtor: 	National Realty Investment Advisors, LLC
Case No.: 	22-14539
Adv. Pro.: 	25-01237
Caption:
equivalent value in return for the transfer while the Debtors were insolvent. 	See also 	N.J.S.A. §
25:2-25(a)(2) and 25:2-
paid to 	and refers to the fees in the two years preceding the bankruptcy in the amount of
approximately $5,000. [ECF No. 1, ¶¶ 225-26, 243-44]. There is no allegation that these fees were
unreasonable, or more than fees
constructive fraudulent transfers in Counts Five and Seven are dismissed.
The Plaintiff seeks to recover and preserve the allegedly avoidable transfers under 11
U.S.C. §§ 550 and 551, and/or applicable state law for the transfers in Counts Four through Seven.
The Court has dismissed Counts Five and Seven but Counts Four and Six have not been dismissed.
The claims for recovery and preservation of the avoided transfers in Counts Four and Six will not
be dismissed.
In the BofA Decision, the Court found that Plaintiff adequately alleged facts demonstrating
that NRIA committed conversion of Investor funds. Particularly, the Court determined in the BofA
Decision that the Plaintiff demonstrated that the bank advised Dustin Salzano to add a DBA name
to the account for a specific property, which drew the b
account was being used to make payments for purposes other than that property. This is a specific
allegation that showed that BofA may have aided and abetted conversion of Investor property.
[BofA Decision, pp. 24-25].
But unlike in the BofA Decision, the Plaintiff here did not adequately allege facts
demonstrating Valley had knowledge that NRIA engaged in the conversion of Investor funds or
Case 25-01237-JKS Doc 17 Filed 02/18/26 Entered 02/18/26 11:04:19 Desc Main
Document Page 13 of 14
Page 14
Debtor: 	National Realty Investment Advisors, LLC
Case No.: 	22-14539
Adv. Pro.: 	25-01237
Caption:
provide substantial assistance. While there may be a similar conversion claim here, it is not
specifically laid out by the Plaintiff in Count Ten.
conversion in Count Ten is dismissed but the Plaintif
In Count Eleven of the Complaint, the Plaintiff alleges that Valley was unjustly enriched.
As found in the BofA Decision, the Plaintiff suggests that 	retention of banking fees in
exchange for providing banking services was unjust. This claim is like the constructive fraudulent
conveyance claims above that are being dismissed. Also, 	retention of the fees paid by
prevails on one of its aiding and abetting tort claims,
and New Jersey does not recognize unjust enrichment as an independent tort cause of action.
Jurista v. Amerinox Processing Inc., 492 B.R. 707, 754 (D.N.J. 2013) (citation omitted). Count
Eleven is dismissed.
As in the BofA Case, Valley has not filed a claim in the NRIA bankruptcy that can be
disallowed or equitably subordinated. Therefore, Count Twelve is dismissed without prejudice. If
Valley
CONCLUSION
Two, Five,
Seven, Ten, Eleven, and Twelve,
leave to amend the Complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(2) is fully preserved.
Case 25-01237-JKS Doc 17 Filed 02/18/26 Entered 02/18/26 11:04:19 Desc Main
Document Page 14 of 14

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.