Preston Serrano and Lillian M. Serrano

1
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
In re: 	PRESTON SERRANO, JR., a/k/a 	No. 7-08-12723 MA
PRES SERRANO, JR., a/k/a PRESENTACION
SERRANO, JR., a/k/a PRES SERRANO, and
LILLIAN M. SERRANO,
Debtors.
ORDER DENYING DEBTORS’ MOTION TO REOPEN DEBTORS’
BANKRUPTCY CONCERNING THE COURT’S ORDER DENYING
DEBTORS’ MOTION TO AVOID JUDICIAL LIENS
THIS MATTER is before the Court on Debtors’ Motion to Reopen Debtors’ Bankruptcy
Concerning the Court’s Order Denying Debtors’ Motion to Avoid Judicial Liens (“Motion”).
Debtors seek to reopen their bankruptcy case for the purpose of requesting the court to
reconsider its Order Denying Debtors’ Motion to Avoid Judicial Liens entered December 5,
2008 (“Order”). Debtors seek to avoid a judicial lien filed by Creditor Theresa Hatcher in
Nevada (“Hatcher Judgment”). 	Theresa Hatcher filed an objection to the Motion. See Docket #
26.
Debtors no longer own any property in Nevada and have not declared a homestead
exemption in any property located in Nevada. 	As previously determined by the Court in its
Order, the Debtors are not entitled to avoid the Hatcher Judgment under 11 U.S.C. § 522(f) as a
judicial lien that impairs an exemption to which the Debtors are otherwise entitled. Debtors
listed the claim of Theresa Hatcher on Schedule C filed in this bankruptcy proceeding. The
Debtors received a discharge on November 24, 2008. 	Consequently the debt represented by the
Hatcher Judgment was discharged through the Debtors’ bankruptcy. 	The Hatcher Judgment,
recorded in Nevada, does not attach to any property the Debtors may acquire in Nevada in the
Case 08-12723-m7 Doc 28 Filed 01/21/09 Entered 01/21/09 15:41:23 Page 1 of 2

1See 11 U.S.C. § 524(a)(1) (“A discharge in a case under this title . . . voids any judgment
at any time obtained, to the extent that such judgment is a determination of the personal liability
of the debtor with respect to any debt discharged under section 727 . . .”); In re Norvell, 198 B.R.
697, 699 (Bankr.W.D.Ky. 1996)(“A judgment lien will not attach to any real estate acquired by
the debtor after the filing of a Chapter 7 bankruptcy proceeding in which the debtor received a
discharge.”); In re Locust, 2005 WL 1288616, *1 n.1 (Bankr.M.D.N.C.
2005)(unreported)(noting that even though the debtor was not entitled to avoid the lien under §
522(f), § 524 relieves the debtor from the judgment. “Once the judgment is voided under § 524 it
cannot thereafter affix to or become a lien against . . . other real property acquired by the Debtor
in the future.”)(citing In re Ogburn, 212 B.R. 984 (Bankr.M.D.Ala. 1995) and Norvell, 198 B.R.
at 699).
2
future.1
WHEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is DENIED.
____________________________________
MARK B. McFEELEY
United States Bankruptcy Judge
Date entered on docket: January 21, 2009
COPY TO:
Erenio Gutierrez, Jr
Attorney for Debtors
PO Box 35278
Albuquerque, NM 87176-5278
Theresa Hatcher
1717 Ferrell Street
Las Vegas, NV 89106
Case 08-12723-m7 Doc 28 Filed 01/21/09 Entered 01/21/09 15:41:23 Page 2 of 2